Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Tkachenko I. N., Dubrovsky V. Z., Starikov Y. N. Institutional and technological factors in Russian industrial development. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 312-321. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-3-312-321, EDN: RTMVFX

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon ekonomika_2024_3-312-321.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Management
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
330.341:338.246.2:338.45.01
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-3-312-321
EDN: 
RTMVFX

Institutional and technological factors in Russian industrial development

Autors: 
Tkachenko Irina Nikolaevna, Ural State University of Economics
Dubrovsky Valery Zh., Ural State University of Economics
Starikov Yevgeniy Nikolaevich, Ural State University of Economics
Abstract: 

Introduction. This article is devoted to the consideration of methodological issues of the influence of technologies and institutions on the processes of technological development and structural modernization of the industrial complex, and also to the development of management tools aimed at supporting the technological development of industry based on the concept of the institutional-technological matrix of industrial policy. Theoretical analysis. It is now recognized that structural changes in industry are one of the main characteristics of a country’s economic growth. At the same time, the main sources of structural transformations in industry are the institutional environment and technological progress. At the present stage of development, the main trend in technological development is the technologies of the IV industrial revolution, including big data, cloud computing, communications and artificial intelligence. These technologies predetermine such a trend of modern industrial development as a transition from the sectoral hierarchy of the industrial complex towards the technological one. Empirical analysis. Taking into account the significant role of the technological factor in industrial modernization, the authors proposed a typology of technologies in complex industrial-technological systems, based on the approach of co-evolution of technologies or the evolution of mutual adaptation of technologies in a complex technological system S. Results. The analysis carried out and the typology of modern technologies developed by the authors made it possible to form a conceptual vision of the institutional-technological matrix of industrial policy, which makes it possible to manage the technological development processes of industry based on taking into account the characteristics of the institutional environment in which a specific production complex operates.

Key words: 
ndustry
institutions
technology
technological development
typology of technologies
industrial-technological systems
industrial policy
institutional-technological matrix
Reference: 
  1. Boyakova K. N. Regulatory policy for digital transformation of industry in Russia. Biznes. Obshchestvo. Vlast’ [Business. Society. Power], 2022, no. 44–45, pp. 126–140 (in Russian). EDN: TJCJBJ
  2. Smirnov S. A. Modern industrial policy in the Russian Federation and key directions of its transformation. Innovatsionnaya nauka [Innovative Science], 2022, no. 12, pt. 1, pp. 80–85 (in Russian). EDN: ASIDHR
  3. Romanova O. A., Sirotin D. V., Ponomareva A. O. From resistance economy to resilient economy (the case of an industrial region in Russia). AlterEconomics, 2022, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 620–637 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31063/AlterEconomics/2022.19-4.
  4. 4. On the national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period until 2030 and for the future until 2036. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2024 no. 309. ATP “Consultant” [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  5. Sukharev O. S. Industrialization 4.0 and models of technological development to overcome the «2D» effect. Bulletin of the South-Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series Socio-Economic Sciences, 2020, no. 1, pp. 4–23. https://doi.org/10.17213/2075-2067-2020-1-4-23
  6. Perez C. Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publ., 2002. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Moscow, Delo ANKh, 2011. 232 p.).
  7. Glazyev S. Yu. Teoriya dolgosrochnogo tekhniko-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Theory of long-term technical and economic development]. Moscow, VlaDar, 1993. 310 p. (in Russian).
  8. Sehrish Atif. Analysing the alignment between circular economy and industry 4.0 nexus with industry 5.0 era: An integrative systematic literature review. Sustainable Development, 2023, vol. 31, iss. 4, pp. 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2542
  9. Awan U., R. Sroufe R. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2021, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 2038–2060. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2731
  10. Dontsova O. I., Abdikeev N. M., Zotov V. M. Institutional support for high-tech sectors of the manufacturing industry. Management Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 40–54 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2021-11-4-40-54
  11. Lamine W., Anderson A., Jack S. L., Fayolle A. Entrepreneurial space and the freedom for entrepreneurship: Institutional settings, policy, and action in the space industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2021, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1392
  12. Kafouros M., Aliyev M., Piperopoulos P., Au A. K. M., Ho J. W. Y., Wong S. Y. N. The role of institutional quality and industry dynamism in explaining firm performance in emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal Early View, 2023, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 56–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1392
  13. Koshkin A. P., Nechaev D. N. Reindustrialization and new industrialization: the institute of industrial parks in the implementation of state industrial policy in Russian regions (using the example of the Central Federal District regions). Plekhanovskiy nauchnyy byulleten [Plekhanov Scientifi c Bulletin], 2022, no. 1 (21), pp. 146–154 (in Russian). EDN: ELENPX
  14. Putintseva N. A., Ushakova E. V. On the activity of major cluster groups in Russia as a key tool for implementing import substitution and innovation policies. Ekonomika i upravleniie [Economics and Management], 2020, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 940–951 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-9-940-951
  15. Kostyrev A. P. The assessment of the results of industrial policy realization based on a multilevel approach. Finansovaya ekonomika [Financial Economics], 2020, no. 8, pp. 299–304 (in Russian). EDN: NQQZBT
  16. Bogachev Yu. S., Trifonov P. V. Directions for improving the activities of development institutions to support the industrial growth of the Russian economy. Polyot, 2022, no. 5, pp. 40–44 (in Russian).
  17. Coccia M. A New Classification of Technologies. Working Paper CocciaLab n. 26/2, Arizona State University (USA), 2017.
  18. Coccia M. Classification of innovation considering technological interaction. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 2018, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 76–93.
  19. Pistorius C. W. I., Utterback J. M. Multi-mode interaction among technologies. Research Policy, 1997, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00916-X
  20. Akberdina V. V., Pyankova S. G. Methodological aspects of digital transformation of industry. Scientifi c Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 2021, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 292–313 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2021-227-1-292-313
  21. Babkin A. V., Burkaltseva D. D., Kosten D. G., Vorobyov Yu. N. Formation of the digital economy in Russia: Essence, features, technical normalization, development problems. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 2017, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 9–25 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.10301
  22. On approval of the Consolidated Strategy for the Development of the Manufacturing Industry of the Russian Federation until 2024 and for the period until 2035. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 6, 2020, no. 1512-r. ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  23. Evseeva M. V., Starikov Ye. N., Voronov M. P. Technological development of industrial regions: The ecosystem approach. Upravlenets [The Manager], 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 13–30 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-3-2
  24. Tkachenko I. N., Starikov Ye. N., Evseeva M. V. Effect evaluation of the industrial policy project instruments application in the regions. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 287–294 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2022-22-3-287-294, EDN: XPFHEN
  25. Kirdina S. G. The theory of institutional matrices: Toward the new paradigm. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2001, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 101–115 (in Russian). EDN: OPAKGT
Received: 
10.05.2024
Accepted: 
10.06.2024
Available online: 
30.08.2024
Published: 
30.08.2024