Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Akimova M. A., Tumeneva N. V. Symbols of judicial power and rituals of justice: Their prospects in the context of digitalization. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 4, pp. 428-439. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-4-428-439, EDN: SQRAIQ

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
340
EDN: 
SQRAIQ

Symbols of judicial power and rituals of justice: Their prospects in the context of digitalization

Autors: 
Akimova Maria A., Saratov State Law Academy
Tumeneva Nataliya Vladimirovna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Digitalization, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has significantly influenced the development of public power and law, triggering the transformation of many state-legal institutions, processes, and legal relations. The judicial system was no exception: it was one of the first to begin to modernize when, in the realities of covid lockdown, the administration of justice switched to a remote format. Problem statement. The implementation of justice in the remote format revealed a number of diverse organizational problems (for example, unequal technical capabilities and weak digital skills of participants in the process, low information and communication culture of many of them, etc.) and procedural issues, related, in particular, to the change in the procedural form, which began to be simplified and optimized, and also led to the abuse of the ritual form and its non-compliance. Theoretical analysis. The term “symbol” has many meanings, and in every science it has its own meaning. Symbolism has always been inherent in law, and the symbols of justice are among the most recognizable in the world. The symbols of justice are diverse and ambiguous. The actions of the court, which are given special legal significance and which are performed in a particularly solemn and official atmosphere, have symbolic significance. They should be called rituals of justice, manifested in a special ritual form. Empirical analysis. The practical significance of symbolic rituals of justice relies on the fact that they have the meaning of a legal fact and a strictly defined form of manifestation, i.e. they are part of the procedural form. As the practice of recent years has shown, the procedural form, when conducting a trial in the remote format, is not only simplified, but also often ignored by the participants in the process. In our opinion, external factors and circumstances contribute to this: for example, the use of web communication, along with video conferencing, as well as the actual rejection of certain principles of justice. Results. In the context of digitalization, under the influence of which the modernization of the Russian judicial system is being accelerated, two trends have emerged. On the one hand, the introduction of digital technologies is aimed at expanding access to justice, efficiency and convenience of its implementation and, accordingly, turning it into a high-tech public service accessible to the subject from anywhere, wherever he or she is. On the other hand, technologization entails a significant simplification of the procedural form, generates competition of the principles of justice, calls into question the possibility of carrying out a number of symbolic actions expressed in a ritual form.

Reference: 
  1. Alekseeva I. Yu., Arshinov V. I. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i NBIKS-revolyutsiya [Information society and NBICS-revolution]. Moscow, RAS Institute of Philosophy Publ., 2016. 196 p. (in Russian). EDN: ZXRUGX
  2. Bryantseva O.V., Soldatkina O.L. E-Justice in Russia: Problems and solutions. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2019, no. 12, pp. 97–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2019.64.12.097-104
  3. Umnova-Konyuhova I. A. The future of justice in the context of digitalization. Social and Humanitien Sciences: Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 4. State and Law, 2022, no. 3, pp. 62–75 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31249/rgpravo/2022.03.06, EDN: HCJRGQ
  4. Nyrkov V. V. On the issue of theoretical and methodological (doctrinal) foundations of the method of legal regulation of “electronic” legal relations in the field of civil law proceedings. In: Vorontsova I. V. (ed.) Transformatsiya i tsifrovizatsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy v sovremennykh realiyakh i usloviyakh pandemii [Transformation and digitalization of legal regulation of public relations in modern realities and conditions of the pandemic]. Kazan, Otechestvo, 2020, pp. 210–214 (in Russian). EDN: KINHGA
  5. Karataev I. A. Procedural economy in civil proceedings. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Saratov, 2023. 243 p. (in Russian). EDN: EJUMAA
  6. Zarubina M. A. Justifi ed and unjustifi ed risks of simplifying the civil procedural form. Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2023, no. 1, pp. 7–12 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383X-2023-1-7-12
  7. Zimmel G. On the essence of culture. In: Zimmel G. Izbrannoe. Sozertsanie zhizni [Favorites. Contemplation of life]. 2nd ed. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Center for Humanitarian Initiatives, 2017, pp. 295–301 (in Russian).
  8. Kapitsyn V. M. Symbols in law and globalization. Nravstvennye imperativy v prave [Moral Imperatives in Law], 2012, no. 1, pp. 49–58 (in Russian).
  9. Kurdybajlo D. S., Kurochkin F. F. Metaphysics and Law: On the term “symbol” in some texts of Emperor Justinian I. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina [Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal], 2019, no. 3, pp. 17–28 (in Russian). EDN: ZKTMSH
  10. Vlasova G. B. Symbols and rituals as cultural characteristics of legal proceedings. Philosophiya Prava, 2007, no. 2, pp. 69–73 (in Russian).
  11. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ F. A. Brokgauza i I. A. Efrona [The encyclopedic dictionary of F. A. Brockhaus and I. A. Efron]. Vol. 63. St. Petersburg, Semenovskaya Tipografi ya (I. A. Efrona), 1901. 498 p. (in Russian).
  12. Giro P. Chastnaya i obshchestvennaya zhizn’ rimlyan [Private and public life of the Romans]. St. Petersburg, L. F. Panteleeva, 1899. 623 p. (in Russian).
  13. Maronin E. Yu. Otlichie yuridicheskoy fiktsii ot drugikh pravovykh ponyatiy (The difference between legal fi ction and other legal concepts). Available at http://superinf.ru (in Russian) (accessed April 5, 2024) (in Russian).
  14. Shalaginov P. D. Functions of legal symbols. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Nizhny Novgorod, 2007. 165 p. (in Russian). EDN: NOYMAB
  15. Rusakova N. G. The oath as a general legal phenomenon. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Nizhny Novgorod, 2008. 32 p. (in Russian).
  16. Safronova S. S. Roman symbols of a justice and a judiciary. Ivs Antiqvvm, 2010, no. 1 (25), pp. 124–128 (in Russian).
  17. Lonskaya S. V. Symbolization of judicial space as a historical and legal phenomenon. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 359–365 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2023-7-3-359-365
  18. Trezubov E. S. “Procedural revolution”. Review of changes to civil procedural Codes. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2019, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 187–198 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2019-3-2-187-198
  19. Malakhov V. P., Aznagulova G. M. The problem of legal understanding in digital reality. MCU Journal of Legal Sciences, 2021, no. 2 (42), pp. 37–44 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9113.2021.42.2.04
  20. Knyazkin S. I. Conditionality of unconditional procedural grounds for reversal of court rulings within simplifi ed proceedings. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process [Arbitration and Civil Procedure], 2018, no. 6, pp. 49–54 (in Russian). EDN: URTMCU
  21. Kulisher M. About symbolism in law. New essays from the comparative history of culture. Vestnik Evropy [Bulletin of Europe], 1883, no. 7, pp. 188–208 (in Russian).
  22. Gins G. K. Law and culture: (Processes of formation and development of law). Memoirs of the Harbin Law College. Vol. 12. Law and Culture: A collection in commemoration of the eighteen-year existence of the Faculty of Law in Harbin. Harbin, Russko-Manchzhurskaya Knigotorgovlya, N. I. Nikiforov, 1938 (Zarya), pp. 165–370 (in Russian).
  23. Karasevich P. L. Grazhdanskoe obychnoe pravo Frantsii v istoricheskom ego razvitii [The civil customary law of France in its historical development]. Moscow, Izd-vo A. I. Mamontova i Ko, 1875. 488 p. (in Russian).
  24. Mal’tsev I. V. Simvoly v prave, pravovoy nauke i yuridicheskom obrazovanii [Symbols in law, legal science and legal education]. Moscow, NORMA, 2022. 256 p. (in Russian).
  25. Isaev I. A. Symbolism of the legal form (a historical perspective). Pravovedenie [Law Studies], 2002, no. 6 (245), pp. 4–10 (in Russian).
  26. Gurenko D. V. Rituals and symbols in judicial practice: Legal-anthropological aspects. Jurist Pravoved, 2006, no. 4, pp. 83–85 (in Russian). EDN: YLHAUP
  27. Myachikova I. I. Metodologicheskie osnovy simvolikovedeniya [Methodological foundations of the symbolism of management]. Minsk, BSEU Publ., 2002. 120 p. (in Russian).
  28. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk, 1995. 907 p. (in Russian).
  29. Goncharova N. S. Symbols in Russian criminal law. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Saratov, 2024. 301 p. (in Russian).
  30. Nikitin A. V. Legal symbols. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Nizhniy Novgorod, 1999. 31 p. (in Russian).
  31. Sharno O. I. Legal symbols as means of law enforcement technology. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Saratov, 2014. 181 p. (in Russian).
  32. Davydova M. L. Classifi cation of legal symbols. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2008, no. 4, pp. 4–11 (in Russian). EDN: KUXVQJ
  33. Moiseeva E. All rise! The court is now in session: Judicial proceedings as a subject of sociological analysis. Laboratorium, 2018, no. 10 (1), pp. 29–51 (in Russian).
  34. Vlasova T. V., Duel’ V. M., Zanina M. A. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of state and law]. Moscow, RAP, 2013. 226 p. (in Russian).
  35. Shumyagina O. S. The meaning of judicial rituals in Langobardic law. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 2018, no. 1, pp.79–84 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2018-1-79-84
  36. Dobronichenko E. V. Functional and semantic scope of a ritual space: To the issue of definitions. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2013, no. 6 (81), pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
  37. Palashevskaya I. V. Verbal peculiarities of British legislature. Bulletin of North Ossetian State University Named After K. L. Khetagurov. Social Sciences, 2010, no. 2, pp. 191–196 (in Russian). EDN: MSUARH
  38. Artemjeva A. A. On the question of ritual: The etymology and definition of the term. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2010, no. 7, pp. 74–77 (in Russian). EDN: NUTBMT
  39. Nikitin A. V., Fofanova L. S. The legal symbol as a special means of legal technique. Gosudarstvo i pravo Rossii: istoriya – sovremennost’ – perspektivy razvitiya [State and Law of Russia: History – Modernity – Development Prospects: Proceedings of the IV Regional Inter-University Scientific and Practical Conf. (Novgorod, December 10, 2008). Nizhniy Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod branch of the Institute of Business and Politics Publ., 2009, pp. 114–122 (in Russian).
  40. Voplenko N. N. Legal symbols. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie, 1995, no. 4–5, pp. 71–73. (in Russian).
  41. Interv’yu General’nogo direktora Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verkhovnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii Guseva A. V. informatsionnomu agentstvu TASS (Interview of the Director General of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Gusev A. V. to the TASS news agency). Available at: http://www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=59&item=5741 (accessed May 10, 2024) (in Russian). 
Received: 
17.05.2024
Accepted: 
01.06.2024
Available online: 
25.12.2024
Published: 
25.12.2024