Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Dorofeyeva L. I. ПРОБЛЕМЫ СОЦИАЛИЗАЦИИ ЛИЧНОСТИ В НОВОЙ МОДЕЛИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИОННОГО ПОВЕДЕНИЯ. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 4, pp. 413-419. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-4-413-419

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Article type: 
005.32 (075.8)


Dorofeyeva Lyubov Ivanovna, Saratov State University

Introduction. One of the modern trends in the development of management and organizational behavior are the focus on the human factor, the personality, as a key resource of the organization and the strengthening of social and humanistic management orientation. In connection with this organization, operating in an uncertain environment should solve problems hindering the efficient use of human resources and the creation of favorable conditions for the development and realization of the potential of every employee of the organization, resulting in an increase in the importance of social components of management: organizational culture, social justice for workers, management ethics, organizational socialization, social activity of the individual, the social responsibility of organizations. The article examines the place and role of socialization in human resource management system in the new model of organizational behavior. Theoretical analysis. On the basis of generalization of existing theoretical research on socialization in the article given the definition of organizational socialization, disclosed its immediate and ultimate goals are formulated functions are considered stages of socialization and the problem of deviant behavior of staff. Results. It was found that the effective socialization of the person in the new model of organizational behavior must form not only member of the organization, but also its citizen, a patriot who possessed not only the necessary knowledge, skills, roles, norms and rules of conduct, but also aware of their duties and responsibilities for the decision organizational problems and binds its further development and career with work in the organization.

  1. Dorofeyeva L. I. Osnovy teorii upravleniya [Fundamentals of Management Theory]. Saratov, Amirik Publ., 2015. 434 p.
  2. Organizatsionnoe povedenie [Organizational behavior. Ed. by G. R. Latfullin, О. N. Gromova]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2006. 432 p.
  3. Mescon M. H., Albert M. Khedouri F. Osnovy Menedzhmenta [Management]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2002. 704 p.
  4. Newstrom J. W., Davis K. Organizatsionnoe povedenie [Organizational behavior]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 447 p.
  5. Schein E. Organizatsionnaia kul’tura i liderstvo [Organizational culture and leadership. 3rd ed.]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2011. 336 p.
  6. Gibson J. L., Ivancevich J. M., Donnelly J. H. Jr. Organizatsii: povedenie, struktura, processy [Organizations: behavior, structura, processes]. St. Petersburg, INFRA-M Publ., 2000. 662 p.
  7. Khokhlova T. P. Upravlenie povedencheskimi otkloneniiami i puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu (Management of behavioral deviations and ways to sustainable development). Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom (Management of Russia and abroad). Available at: http://www.mevriz.ru/articles/2010/1/5963.html (accessed 10 September 2016).
  8. Dorofeyeva L. I. Izmenenie vzaimodeistviya «organizatsiya – lichnost’» v novoi modeli organizatsionnogo povedeniya [Сhange of Interaction «Organization – the Person» in the New Model Organizational Behavior]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 1, pt. 1, pp. 543‒549.