Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Giverts P. V. Comparative Analysis of Prospects for Application in Forensic Ballistic Identification Microscopes of Different Systems. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 191-196. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-1-2-191-196

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
343.98

Comparative Analysis of Prospects for Application in Forensic Ballistic Identification Microscopes of Different Systems

Autors: 
Giverts Pavel Vitalievich, Division of Identification and Forensic Science, National Police HQ
Abstract: 

Introduction. Due to technological improvement the question presents itself – is not it time firearms examiners changed optical microscopes to something more modern, and what this could be. Theoretical analisis. The article reviews three different kinds of microscopes (Optical, Electron Scanning and Confocal/Virtual) which can be used, their design and principles of work. Experimental investigation. To stu dy the potential of equipment and for the interdetermination of it the authors used these equipment for real life case examinations. Discussion of results. The results of using three different kinds of comparison microscopes for real life case examinations were analyzed with the purpose to compare their potential, advantages and disadvantages. Conclusions. The article shows the advisability of using optical microscopes in most cases and the necessity of improvement of virtual microscopes which can get its place in the work of firearms examiner.

Reference: 
  1. Atteberry J. How Scanning Electron Microscopes Work. Available at: http://www.unl.du/CMRAcfem/em.htm (acccessed 7 February 2012).
  2. Katterwe H., Goebel R., Grooss K. D. The Comparison Scanning Electron Microscope within the Field of Forensic Science. AFTE Journal, 1983, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 141–146.
  3. Katterwe H., Braune M., Korschgen A., Radke B., Weimar B. Comparison Scanning Electron Microscopy in Forensic Science: from the Beginning of the Electron Microscopy towards Comparison-Variable Pressure-SEM Imaging in Firearms and Tool Marks Examinations. AFTE Journal, 2009, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 283–289.
  4. The InterNet site of Forensic Technology Inc. Available at: www.forensictechnology.com (acccessed 7 February 2012).
  5. A brief description of the principles of confocal microscopy. Available at: http://www.bio.brandeis.edu/marderlab/microscopyB.html (acccessed 7 February 2012).
  6. Hocherman G., Giverts P., Shoshani E. Identification of polygonal barrel sub-family characteristics. AFTE Journal, 2003, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 197–200.
  7. Giverts P. Spetsifi ka I metodika provedeniia ballis ticheskikh ekspertiz v Izraile [The specifi city and methods of conducting ballistic examinations in Israel]. Teoriia i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy. Nauch.-prakt. Zhurnal, 2009, no. 2(14), pp. 188–195.
Received: 
20.11.2013
Accepted: 
18.12.2013