Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
339.9; 330.43

Political Risk as a Factor of Foreign Direct Investment into Transition Economies

Autors: 
Sirotin Vyacheslav Pavlovich, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)
Bychenkov Denis Vladimirovich, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)
Abstract: 

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is one of the most important resources of developing countries’ economic modernization. According to international investors, political risk is one of the major deterrents to investment in emerging markets. Opinions about the significance of this influence are different depending on the considered period. The latest crisis could make adjustments in the investment policy. Nevertheless, some developing countries show a very significant amount of FDI attracted. This paper tries to answer the question: is there a dependence of the FDI inflow on the level of political risk in developing countries? And what kinds of political risk are most significant for foreign investors? Methods. On the basis of integral indicators of political risk in 149 countries from 2002 to 2010, authors have built the various econometric models in order to verify statistically the relation between political risk and FDI to developing economies. Results. According to the best of the created models, the most significant components of political risk for foreign investors are political stability, quality of government regulation, and government effectiveness.

Reference: 
  1. Kuzmin O. M., Sirotin V. P. Modelirovanie innovatsionnogo potentsiala regiona [Modelling of Innovation Potential of the Region]. Finance and Business, 2008, no. 4, pp. 33–41.
  2. Arkhipova M. Yu. Innovatsii i uroven’ zhizni naseleniia: issledovanie vzaimosviazi i osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia [Innovations and Living standards of population: analysis of interconnections and key development trends]. Voprosy statistiki, 2013, no. 4, pp. 45–54.
  3. Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Annual Reports. Available at: http://www.miga.org/resources/ index.cfm?stid=1854 (accessed 10 November 2013).
  4. Bennett P. D., Green R. T. Political Instability as a Determinant of Direct Foreign Investment in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 1972, vol. 9, pp. 182–186.
  5. Schneider F., Bruno S. F. Economic and Political Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. World Development, 1985, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 161–175.
  6. Nigh D. The Effect of Political Events on United States Direct Foreign Investment: A Pooled Time-Series CrossSectional Analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 1985, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–17.
  7. Loree D. W., Guisinger. S. E. Policy and Non-Policy Determinants of U.S. Equity Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 281–299.
  8. Woodward D. P., Rolfe R. J. The Location of ExportOriented Foreign Direct Investment in the Caribbean Basin. Journal of International Business Studies, 1992, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 121–144.
  9. Li Q. Political Violence and Foreign Direct Investment. Global Strategic Management. 2006, vol.
  10. Regional Economic Integration, pp. 231–255. 10. Meon P.-G., Sekkat K. FDI Waves, Waves of Neglect of Political Risk: Working Paper No 10-004.RS. 2010. Available at: http://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/10-004.html  (accessed 10 November 2013).
  11. Jun K., Singh H. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. Transnational Corporations, 1996, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 67–105.
  12. Gastanaga V., Nugent J., Pashamova B. Host Country Reforms and FDI Infl ows: How Much Difference Do They Make? World Development, 1998, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1299–1314.
  13. Fatehi-Sede K., Safi zadeh M. H. The Association Between Political Instability and Flow of Foreign Direct Investment. Management International Review, 1989, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 4–13.
  14. Li Q., Resnick A. Reversal of Fortunes : Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Infl ows to Developing Countries. International Organization. 2003, vol. 57, no. 1. pp. 175–211. Available at: http://people.tamu.edu/~quanli/research_papers/reprint_files/IO_2003_fdidem.pdf (accessed 10 November 2013).
  15. Oliba K. O., Crumbley C. L. Determinants of U.S. Private Foreign Direct Investments in OPEC Nations: From Public and Non-Public Policy Perspectives. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 1997, vol. 9, pp. 331–355.
  16. Wheeler D., Mody A. International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of US Firms. Journal of International Economics, 1992, vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 57–76.
  17. Asiedu E. On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different? World Development, 2002, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 107–119.
  18. Globerman S., Shapiro D. Governance Infrastructure and US Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 2003, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 19–39.
  19. Bevan A. A., Estrin S. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment into European Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2004, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 775–787.
  20. Aharoni Y. The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Boston, MA : Harvard University Press, 1966. 362 p.
  21. Porcano T. M. Factors Affecting the Foreign Direct Investment Decision of Firms From and Into Major Industrialized Countries. Multinational Business Review, 1993, vol. 1, pp. 26–36.
  22. World Investment Prospects to 2011: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Political Risk. EIU and the Columbia Program on International Investment. London: Economist Intelligence Unit, 2007. Available at: http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/WIP_2007_WEB.pdf  (accessed 10 November 2013).
  23. Management in Emerging Markets. London, Ernst & Young, 2007. 68 p.
  24. Promise or Peril? The Lure of the Emerging Markets. Atradius and EIU. London, Economist Intelligence Unit, 2008. 24 p.
  25. Emerging Markets: Reshaping the Global Economy: International Business Report 2008. Chicago, Grant Thornton, 2008. 20 p.
Received: 
17.09.2013
Accepted: 
23.10.2013