Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
347; 347.918

Theoretical and Practical Issues of the Hearing with Videoconferencing Systems

Autors: 
Kruzhalova Alyona Valeryevna, Saratov State Law Academy
Abstract: 

The persons involved in the case have the right to participate in arbitration Russia remotely using videoconferencing systems (VCS) according to the Federal Law dated 27.07.2010 № 228-FZ. This article examines a number of problems in the implementation of this law. Theoretical analysis. The author substantiate of independence of the Institute «hearing by VCS». We investigate the controversial moments of break and deposition hearing, which is conducted with IT-technology. We give a number of practical recommendations on the content of a pleading for video conferencing, and theoretical analysis of Part 1 of Article 153.1 of the Arbitration Procedure Code (APC) in respect of the persons entitled to file such a petition. The author proposes to amend to the paragraph 2 of Part 2 of Article 64 of the APC on the list of admissible evidence in the hearing via VCS. Conclusions. The need to consolidate the common rules for the arbitration courts in Russia hearings by VCS. The author proposes a definition of «hearing with videoconferencing systems».

Reference: 
  1. Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2010, no. 31, article 4197.
  2. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Bulletin of Higher Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation], 2011, no. 4.
  3. Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 30, article 3012.
  4. Cherepanova O. V. O voprosah, voznikshikh pri realizatsii polozheniy APK RF, svyazannykh s organizatsiey I provedeniem video-konferents-svyazi (On issues that have arisen in the implementation of the provisions of the Code of Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation relating to the organization and conduct video conferencing). Zakon [Law], 2011, no.10. Available at: http://14aas.arbitr.ru/welcome/show/633200012/368  (accessed 14 April 2013) (in Russian).
  5. Opredelenie Semnadtsatogo apellyatsionnogo arbitrazhnogo suda. Delo № 17AP-13330/2011-GK (Defi ning the Seventeenth Arbitration Court of Appeal. The case number 17AP-13330/2011-GK). Available at: http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ecd769f4-37ca-416e-b41b-2399a17d6c59/A60-21477-2011_20111207_Opredelenie.pdf  (accessed 25 May 2013) (in Russian).
  6. Available at: http://14aas.arbitr.ru/welcome/showall/91 ; http://primkray.arbitr.ru/process/videokonferent  (accessed 14 April 2013) (in Russian).
  7. Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Udmurtskoy Respubliki. Delo № A71-16448/2011 (Defi ning the Court of Arbitration of the Udmurt Republic. The case number A71-16448/2011). Available at: http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a3de34f0-7710-4ac4-b19f-24ab58b0cfde/A71-16448-2011_20120203_Opredelenie.pdf  (accessed 25 May 2013) (in Russian).
  8. Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Khanty-Mansiyskogo avtonomnogo okruga – Yugry. Delo № A75-5347/2011 (Defining the Arbitration Court of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra. The case number A75-5347/2011). Available at: http://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/8bdf0220-9a9a-472c-8bee-9cda5d06a523/A75-5347-2011_20110920_Opredelenie.pdf (accessed 25 May 2013).
  9. Vilyak O. I. Protsessualno-pravovye I organizatsionnotekhnicheskie problemy ispolzovaniya videokonferentssvyazi v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Procedural and legal, organizational and technical problems of using videoconferencing in the arbitration process]. Arbitrazhniy I grazhdanskiy protsess [Arbitration and civil procedure], 2012, no. 7, pp. 13–20 (in Russian).
  10. O prisoedinenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii k Konventsii o poluchenii za granitsey dokazatelstv po grazhdanskim ili torgovym delam: Federalnyj zakon ot 12 fevralya 2011 № 11-FZ [On the accession of the Russian Federation to the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters: The Federal Law of February 12, 2001 № 11-FL]. Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2001, no. 7, article 616.
  11. Kudelich E. A. Video-konferets-svyaz kak instrument mezhdunarodnoy pravovoy pomoshchi po grazhdanskim I torgovym delam [Video conferencing as a tool of international legal assistance in civil and commercial matters]. Zakon [Law], 2012, no. 8, pp. 39–50 (in Russian).
Received: 
08.07.2013
Accepted: 
19.08.2013