Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Bushkarev A. N. The Restrictions and the Bans Connected with Implementation of Powers of the Judge. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 117-121. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2018-18-1-117-121

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon 1-2018_ekonomika.18.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Law
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
342.56
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2018-18-1-117-121

The Restrictions and the Bans Connected with Implementation of Powers of the Judge

Autors: 
Bushkarev Andrey N., Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Administration of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract: 

Introduction. In article the requirements to judges and also to candidates for the judge’s position provided by the current legislation of the Russian Federation are considered. Similar requirements inherently represent the system of restrictions of constitutional rights of the person and citizen. Theoretical analysis. The analysis of the current legislation allows to draw a conclusion that requirements imposed to the judge represent the bans connected with acquisition of legal status of the judge, and requirements imposed to candidates for the judge’s position – restrictions. Empirical analysis consisting in the analysis law-enforcement and, in particular, jurisprudence has allowed to draw a conclusion that restrictions have to extend not only to candidates for judges, but also to effective judges and also judges in resignation. In other words, not observance of restrictions has to be considered not only as the basis for refusal in appointment to the post, but also as the basis of dismissal of the judge. Results. The conducted research allows to draw a conclusion, on need to enter into the Law on the status of judges the standard terms of restriction and the bans in the legislation on anti-corruption connected with implementation of certain types of public professional activity.

Key words: 
corruption
anti-corruption mechanisms
judicial authority
legal status of the judge
restriction
bans.
Reference: 
  1. Ebzeev B. S. Lichnost’ i gosudarstvo v Rossii: vzaimnaia otvetstvennost’ i konstitutsionnye obiazannosti [The personality and the state in Russia: mutual responsibility and constitutional duties]. Moscow, 2007. 384 p. (in Russian). 
  2. Voevodin L. D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii [The legal status of the personality in Russia. Education quidance]. Moscow, 1997. 304 p. (in Russian). 
  3. Belomestnykh L. L. Ogranichenie prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina (teoreticheskiy aspekt) [Restriction of the rights and freedoms of the person and citizen (theoretical aspect)]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2003. 20 p. (in Russian). 
  4. Troickaya A. A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye predely i ogranicheniya svobody lichnosti i publichnoi vlasti [Constitutional and legal limits and restrictions of personal freedom and public power]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2009. 24 p. (in Russian). 
  5. Snezhko O. A. Predely zakonodatel’nykh ogranicheniy sotsial’nykh prav [Limits of legislative restrictions of the social rights]. Sravnitelnoe Konstitutsionnoe Obozrenie, 2011, no. 2 (81), pp. 34–46 (in Russian). 
  6. Andreev Yu. N. Ogranicheniya v grazhdanskom prave Rossii [Restrictions in civil law of Russia]. St. Petersburg, 2011. 400 p. (in Russian). 
  7. Mal’ko A. V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave [Incentives and restrictions in the right]. Moscow, 2004. 250 p. (in Russian). 
  8. Adushkin Yu. S. Distsiplinarnoe proizvodstvo v SSSR [Disciplinary production in the USSR. Ed. by V. M. Manokhin]. Saratov, 1986. 128 p. (in Russian).
  9. Buravlev Yu. M. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya distsiplinarnogo prinuzhdeniya v sisteme gosudarstvennoi sluzhby Rossii [Problems of legal regulation of disciplinary coercion in the system of public service of Russia]. Yuridicheskiy mir [Legal world], 2008, no. 10 (142), pp. 56–58 (in Russian). 
  10. Timoshenko I. V. Administrativno-protsessual’naia deiatel’nost’ (administrativnyi process) [Administrative and procedural activity (administrative process)]. Rostov on Don, 2007. 350 p. (in Russian). 
  11. Channov S. E. Distsiplinarnoe prinuzhdenie kak sredstvo obespecheniya sluzhebnykh pravootnosheniy: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy [Disciplinary coercion as instrument for ensuring of offi ce legal relationship: current state and prospects]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess [Administrative law and process], 2012, no. 7, pp. 13–18 (in Russian).
  12. Kozbanenko V. A. Pravovoi status gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhaschikh: struktura i soderzhanie [Legal status of the public civil servants: structure and contents]. Moscow, 2003. 156 p. (in Russian). 
  13. On the status of judges in the Russian Federation. Law of the Russian Federation of 26.06.1992 No. 3132-1 (an edition of 28.12.2016). Vedomosti SND i VS RF [Gazette of the Congress of People’s Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation], 1992, no. 30, art. 1792; Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2017, no. 1 (pt. 1), art. 46 (in Russian). 
  14. Edkova T. A. Obsuzhdenie doktriny zapretov v administrativnom prave [Discussion of the doctrine of the bans in administrative law]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2013, no. 8 (200), pp. 137–144 (in Russian). 
  15. The decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 23.03.2011 No. ГКПИ11-214. ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
Received: 
17.11.2017
Accepted: 
18.12.2017