Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Fenin C. V. The Evolution of Classical and Neoclassical Theories of Territorial Labor Division and International Trade. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 267-274. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2018-18-3-267-274

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
330.8+339.5.01

The Evolution of Classical and Neoclassical Theories of Territorial Labor Division and International Trade

Autors: 
Fenin Cyril V., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. This article investigates stages of development of classical and neoclassical concepts of spatial economics. Theoretical analysis. The evolution of classical and neoclassical theories of the international division of labor and world trade reflected the objective historical conditions and tendencies: the global hegemony of Great Britain in the 19th century, the consequences of the Great Depression of 1929–1933, the global hegemony of the United States after World War II. The ignoring of dynamic changes of economy in classical and neoclassical theories of intercountry labor division is the investigations of their initial theoretical and methodological premises: models of the perfect competition, decreasing or constant return from scale, domination of formal and mathematical logic, lack of mobility of factors of production. Results. Smith, Ricardo, Heckscher – Olin, and Samuelson’s theories were serious and worthy attempts of a research of distribution of different types of economic activity in space. These theories are valuable products of evolution of an economic thought for studying in the context of history of development of the world economy.

Reference: 
  1. Fenin C. V. New Interpretation of the Classical Interregional and International Trade Theories: Economic Logic vs the Economy. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 148–156 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2017-17-2-148-156.
  2. Heckscher E. F. The effects of foreign trade on the distribution of income. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 154–173 (in Russian).
  3. Samuelson P. International Trade and the Equalization of Factor Prices. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought. Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, pp. 205–219 (in Russian).
  4. Stolper W., Samuelson P. Protection and real wages. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 188–204 (in Russian).
  5. Haberler G. The theory of international trade. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 337–348 (in Russian).
  6. Minakir P. A. Economy and space (theses of refl ections). Prostranstvennaia ekonomika [Spatial еconomics], 2005. no. 1, pp. 4–26 (in Russian).
  7. Thisse J.-F. L’oubli de l’espace dans la pensée économique. Prostranstvennaia ekonomika [Spatial еconomics], 2007, no. 4, pp. 88–104 (in Russian).
  8. Domański R. Geografi a ekonomiczna: ujęcie dynamiczne. Warszawa, 2006. 376 p. (Russ. ed.: Domański R. Ekonomicheskaia geografiia: dinamicheskiy aspekt. Moscow, 2010. 376 s.).
  9. Minakir P. A., Demianenko A. N. Spatial Economics: Evolution of Approaches and Methodology. Prostranstvennaia ekonomika [Spatial еconomics], 2010, no. 2, pp. 6–32 (in Russian).
  10. Widodo T. Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures and Case Studies. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 2009, iss. 4, pp. 57–82.
  11. Ozawa T. Professor Kiyoshi Kojima’s Contributions to FDI Theory: Trade, Structural Transformation, Growth, and Integration in East Asia. The International Economy. The Journal of the Japan Society of International Economics, 2007.Vol. 11, no 1, pp. 17–33.
  12. Kireev A. P. Theories of international trade of the XXIst century. In: Ekonomicheskaia shkola: al’manakh. T. 7. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [The School of Economics. Almanac. Vol. 7. International Economics. Ans. ed. A. P. Kireev, V. D. Matveenko]. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 7–30 (in Russian).
  13. Kireev A. P. Puzzle Krugmana [Krugman’s Puzzle]. In: Ekonomicheskaia shkola:al’manakh. T. 7. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [The School of Economics. Almanac. Vol. 7. International Economics. Ans. ed. A. P. Kireev, V. D. Matveenko]. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 269–289 (in Russian).
  14. Maltsev A. A. International Trade as the Subject of Classical School of Political Economy Evolution. Regional’nye issledovaniia [Regional research], 2012, no. 2 (36), pp. 36–43 (in Russian).
  15. Minakir P. A. Economic Analysis and Measurements: spatial case. Prostranstvennaia ekonomika [Spatial еconomics], 2014, no. 1, pp. 12–39 (in Russian).
  16. Hobsbawn E. Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century (1914–1991). London, Abacus, 1995. 627 p. (Russ. ed.: Hobsbawn E. Epokha krainostei: korotkiy dvadtsatyi vek (1914–1991). Moscow, 2004. 632 s.)
  17. Ohlin B. Interregional and international trade. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 174–187 (in Russian).
  18. Isard W. Location and Space-Economy. A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. Cambridge, 1956. 370 p.
  19. Isard W. Methods of Regional Analysis: Аn Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge, 1960. 810 p.
  20. Haggett P. The Spatial Economy. American Behavioral Scientist, 1978, vol. 22, no. l, pp. 151–167.
  21. Jones R. Factor proportion and the H-O theorem. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 236–247 (in Russian).
  22. Samuelson P. The transfer problem and transport costs. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 364–390(in Russian).
  23. Rybczybski T. Factor Endowment and relative commodity prices. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 231–235 (in Russian).
  24. Tinbergen J. Shaping the world economy. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 475–487 (in Russian).
  25. Leontief W. Domestic production and foreign trade. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 220–230 (in Russian).
  26. Samuelson P. Prices of factors and goods in general equilibrium. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 391–409 (in Russian).
  27. World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington DC, The World Bank, 2009. 383 p. (Russ. ed.: Doklad o mirovom razvitii 2009. Novyi vzgliad na ekonomicheskuiu geografi yu. Moscow, 2009. 384 s.).
  28. Krugman P. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. In: Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli: T. 6. Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika [Milestones of an economic thought: Vol. 6. International economy. By total ed. A. P. Kireev]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 523–532 (in Russian).
Received: 
20.06.2018
Accepted: 
24.07.2018