For citation:
Tatarnikov D. G. The Centumviral Court and its practice in inheritance cases: The issue of precedent in Roman law. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 64-72. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2025-25-1-64-72, EDN: MBQKPD
The Centumviral Court and its practice in inheritance cases: The issue of precedent in Roman law
Introduction. The practice of the centumviri court in probate cases had a huge impact on the development of the institutions of Roman law, both substantive and procedural: in general, it demonstrated the role of the court decision in the development of the legal system and showed that the precedent in Rome often acted as the basis for a verdict. Theoretical analysis. The influence of the judicial practice of the centumviri on the development of Roman law in inheritance cases can be explained by the specific legal position of the court in Rome, which was based on its public character. The court was always headed either by magistrates (questores; praetor hastarius) or by persons endowed with public authority by virtue of their position (decemviri in litibus iudicandis; magistratus qui hastae), therefore, in their decisions on inheritance cases, centumviri could act by supplementing civil law and, in some cases, even correcting it. Empirical analysis. Thanks to the practice of the court, the principle of “sui heredes instituendi vel externedandi” was supported, the idea of the right of close persons to actually participate in inheritance was formed by developing legal principles – a kind of fi ction: wills contrary to the duty arising from kindred love (offi cium pietatis) were considered drawn up by testators as if not in their right mind (quasi non sanae mentis fuerunt, ut testamentum ordinarentum) and were declared invalid. The court’s practice formulated the concept of a mandatory share (portio debita) and, by analogy with the “falcidian quarter”, its size was determined. In addition, the court’s practice became the basis for the emergence of a new procedural remedy for bypassed heirs – querella (accusatio) inofficiosi testamenti and, possibly, the formulation of the legal form of Aquilia Galla (postumi Aquiliani). Finally, the resolution of the struggle between the words (verba) and the intentions of the parties (voluntas), which runs through the entire Roman jurisprudence, is connected with the activity of the court. Results. The formulation of new legal principles takes place during the judicial process, and their consolidation is carried out by making decisions by centumviri in certain cases, which, apparently, have the force of precedents, and form the same type of judicial practice, at least in inheritance cases involving wills that violate moral duty.
- Tatarnikov D. G. Precedent in Roman law: Basic terms and their semantic content. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 106–111 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-1-106-111, EDN: CUQJKD
- Voigt M. Ueber die “centumviri, iudices decemviri” und “decemviri litibus iudicandis”. Studi giuridici in onore di Carlo Fadda pel XXV anno del suo insegnamento. Vol. 1. Napoli, Luigi Pierro, 1906, pp. 147–164 (in Italiano).
- Bozza F. Sulla competenza dei Centumviri. Napoli, 1928. 98 p. (in Italiano).
- Luzzatto G. I. Prozedura civile romana. II. Bologna, Zuffi , 1948. 198 p. (in Italiano).
- La Rosa F. Decemviri e centumviri. Labeo, 1958, no. 4, pp. 14–34.
- Mommsen T. Abriss des roemischen Staatsrechts. Darmstadt, Wissenshaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1982. 304 S. (in German).
- Wlassak M. Centumviri 1. Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Bd. III.2. Heidelberg, Berlin, J. B. Metzler’s Verlag, 1899. S. 1935–1952 (in German).
- Mommsen T., Krüger P. (eds.) Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Vol. I. Berolini, Apud Weidmannos, 1870. 1140 p. (in latina).
- Lindsay W. M. (ed.) Sexti Pompei Festi. De verborum signifi catu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome. Lipsiae, B. G. Teubneri, 1913. 574 p. (in latina).
- Pliny. Letters. In two volumes. With an English translation by W. Melmoth. Revised by W. M. L. Hutchinson. London, Wlliam Heinemann; New York, G. P. Putnam’s sons, 1927. 444 p. (in latina).
- Warmington E. H. (ed.) Cicero: in 28 vols. III. De oratore. Books I–II. With an English translation by E. W. Sutton, completed, with an introduction, by H. Rackham. London, Wlliam Heinemann Ltd., Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1967. 479 p. (in latina). https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_oratore.1942
- Hausmaninger H. Centumviri. Der Kleine Pauly: Lexikon der Antike: in 5 Bde. / bearb. und hrsg. von K. Ziegler und W. Sontheimer. München, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1979. Bd. 1, S. 1109–1111 (in German).
- Butler H. E. (ed.) Quintilian. With an English translation. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass., London, Harvard University Press, William Heinemann, Ltd., 1921. 532 p. (in latina).
- Novitsriy I. B., Pereterskiy I. S. (eds.) Rimskoe chastnoe pravo [Roman private law]. Moscow, Yurisprudentsiya, 2002. 442 p. (in Russian).
- Cicero : in 28 vols. V. Brutus, Orator. With an English translation by G. L. Hendrickson, H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; London, Wlliam Heinemann, Ltd., 1971. 538 p. (in latina).
- Cicero. In 28 vols. II. De Inventione. De Optimo Genere Oratorum. Topica. With an English translation by H. M. Hubbell. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; London, Wlliam Heinemann, Ltd., 1968. 466 p. (in latina).
- Pokrovskiy I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava [History of Roman law]. St. Petersburg, Torgovyy dom “Letniy sad” Publ., 1999. 540 p. (in Russian).
- Mommsen T., Krüger P. (eds.) Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Vol. 2. Berolini, Apud Weidmannos, 1870. 1102 p. (in latina).
- Di Lella L. Querela inoffi ciosi testamenti. Contributo allo studio della successione necessaria. Napoli, E. Jovene, 1972. 279 p. (in Italiano).
- Valerius Maximus. Memorable Doings and Sayings. Vol. 2: Books 6–9. Edited and translated by D. R. Shackleton Bailey. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2000. 407 p. 21. Gulina G. La cognizione centumvirale generale nel caso del militans di Val. Max. 7.7.1. Ivris Antiqvi Historia. An International Journal of Ancient Law, 2015, no. 7, pp. 79–113 (in Italiano).
- Grimm D. D. Lektsii po dogme rimskogo prava: posobie dlya slushateley [Lectures on the dogma of Roman Law: A handbook for students]. 5th ed., corr. and suppl. Petrograd, Gosudarstvennaya tipografi ya, 1916. 409 p. (in Russian).
- Kaser M. Das römische Privatrecht. 2. Aufl . Bd. 1. München, C. H. Beck’s Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1971. 880 S. (in German).
- Di Ottavio D. Ricerche in tema di “querela inoffi ciosi testamenti”. Napoli, Jovene editore, 2012. 146 p. (in Italiano).