Cite this article as:

Katkova M. A., Korotin V. O. Socio-economic Factors of Formation of National Identity in the Conditions of Globalization. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 281-?. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Socio-economic Factors of Formation of National Identity in the Conditions of Globalization

Introduction. The urgency of the problems of international cooperation associated with the exacerbation of national consciousness, increased tolerance to violations of national equality and distorted media coverage of conflict on a national basis. Theoretical analysis. The purpose of the article – to identify systemically important factors of national identity. The formation of national identity is determined by the spatial characteristics – border areas. Another factor that is closely related to the previous one, is a land. A feature of the above two factors is that they are not affected by the processes of globalization. The formation of national identity is important not only to the role of government, but also state-forming nation. Results. The analysis found that the largest transformational changes are subject to language, culture and economy that make up the framework of the national identity of any state. Therefore, at the highest level should be given to a system of measures and activities to institutionalize the influence of globalization processes and the development of protective mechanisms for the preservation of the most vulnerable places in the formation of national identity.


1. Nikolaev A. N. «Russkaia matritsa» ili tsivilizatsionnaia razvilka? [«Russian matrix» or civilizational crossroads]. Vlast’ [Authorities], 2014, no. 2, pp. 46–49.
2. Sobornoe slovo XIX Vsemirnogo russkogo narodnogo sobora po teme «Nasledie kniazia Vladimira i sud’by istoricheskoi Rusi» (Conciliar word XIX World Russian People’s Council on «The Legacy of Prince Vladimir, and the fate of historical Rusi»). Available at: (accessed 15 February 2016).
3. Katkova M. A. Vliianie globalizatsii na razvitie institutsionalnoi struktury rynka informatsionnykh tekhnologii [The impact of globalization on the development of the institutional structure of the information technology market. Cand. econ. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2006. 176 р.
4. Korotin V. O. Modeli natsionalnoi identichnosti v sovremennom obschestve [Models of national identity in modern society]. Vestnik PAGS [Bulletin of the Volga Region Academy for civil service], 2014, no. 4 (43), pp. 128–133.
5. Koroleva-Konoplianaia G. I. Teoriia etnogeneza L. N. Gumileva [The theory of ethnogenesis L. N. Gumilyov]. Sotsial’no-politicheskii zhurnal [Socio-political magazine],1994, no. 7–8. pp. 121–125.
6. Filyushkin A. Kogda Rossiia stala schitatsia ugrozoi Zapadu? Livonskaia voyna glazami evropeitsev [When Russia was considered a threat to the West? Livonian War through the eyes of European]. Rossiia–XXI [Russia–XXI], 2004, no. 3. pp. 118–157.
7. Levi-Strauss С. Antropología estructural: Mito, sociedad, humanidades. México: Siglo XXI Eds, 1990. 435 p.
8. Komaroff Dzh. Natsionalnost’, etnichnost’, sovremennost’: politika sa- moosoznaniia v kontse XX veka [Nationality, ethnicity, modernity: the policy of selfrealization in the late twentieth century]. Etnichnost’ i vlast’ v polietnicheskikh gosudarstvakh [Ethnicity and power in the multiethnic states. Collected of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994, pp. 36–53.
9. Yang K. Dialektika kulturnogo pliuralizma: kontseptsiia i realnost’ [The dialectic of cultural pluralism: the concept and reality]. Etnichnost’ i vlast’ v polietnicheskikh gosudarstvakh [Ethnicity and power in the multiethnic states. Collected of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994, pp. 86–116.
10. Solonevich I. L. Narodnaia monarkhiia [The People’s monarchy]. Moscow, EKSMO-press, 2003. 608 p.
11. Danilevskiy N. Ya. Rossiia i Evropa [Russia and Europe]. Moscow, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2011. 818 p.
12. Artanovskiy S. N. Problema etnotsentrizma, etnicheskogo svoeobraziia kultur I mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii v sovremennoi zarubezhnoi etnografi i I sotsiologii [The problem of ethnocentrism, cultural and ethnic identity of ethnic relations in modern foreign ethnography and sociology]. Aktualnye problemy etnografi i i sovremennaia zarubezhnaia nauka [Actual problems of ethnography and modern foreign science. Collection of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, pp. 11–40.
13. Tokarev S. A. Andre Lerua-Guran i ego trudy po etnografi i i arkheologii [Andre Leroi-Gourhan and his
works on ethnography and archeology]. Etnologicheskie issledovaniia za rubezhom [Ethnological studies abroad. Collection of articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973, pp.183–230.
14. Vladimir Putin: Russkie – gosudarstvoobrazuyuschiy narod v Rossii (Vladimir Putin: Russian – state-forming people in Russia). Available at: (accessed 15 June 2015).
15. Mayorova I. I. Tendentsii razvitiia obucheniia i vospitaniia korennykh narodov Kanady i Avstralii: XIX–XX vv. [Trends in the development of training and education of indigenous peoples in Canada and Australia: XIX–XX centuries. Cand. pedagog. sci. thesis diss.]. Moscow, 2010. 23 p.

Full Text (PDF): 
одобрена к публикации
Short Text (PDF):