Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Zabolotskaya V. V. Methods for diagnostics and forecasting SMEs creditworthiness using artificial intelligence. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 294-311. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-3-294-311, EDN: OWEQBG

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
336.77
EDN: 
OWEQBG

Methods for diagnostics and forecasting SMEs creditworthiness using artificial intelligence

Autors: 
Zabolotskaya Victoria Viktorovna, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Abstract: 

Introduction. The impact of multidirectional external macroeconomic and regional factors of the economic environment in conditions of uncertainty and increased risks causes significant difficulties in diagnosing, assessing and forecasting the creditworthiness of financial and credit support recipients and borrowers (micro, small and medium-sized enterprises) in the Russian Federation. Theoretical analysis. The author systematized the basic mathematical methods and models for assessing and forecasting the level of creditworthiness of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in foreign and Russian practice, using modern systems and technologies of artificial intelligence and machine learning methods. Empirical analysis. The author proposed the results of approbation of methodological approach for express diagnostics of the financial and economic condition and forecasting the creditworthiness of SMEs in the Krasnodar krai for the period of 2014–2017, based on expert assessment methods, economic analysis and fuzzy logic systems, which form the credit rating of SMEs considering their industry affiliation. Results. In this study, the author has determined the advantages and disadvantages of methods and models for diagnosing creditworthiness and credit scoring from the perspective of their application for various categories of SMEs. As it is shown that the most promising and mathematically reliable models for credit scoring and risk assessment of financial support and lending to various enterprises in the SME sector at different stages of their life cycle both in Russia and abroad are computerized models and expert systems, based on such methods and technologies of Artificial Intelligence, as fuzzy logic systems, artificial neural networks, support vector machines, ensemble methods (random forest method), as well as intelligent information systems, hybrid models and hybrid systems. The study reveals that their combination with each other will allow to achieve synergistic and system effects in the interaction between lenders and borrowers (SMEs) and timely avoid their bankruptcy.

Reference: 
  1. Abdou H. A., Pointon J. Credit scoring, statistical techniques, and evaluation criteria: A review of the literature. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management, 2011, no. 18, pp. 59−88. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.325
  2. Leonenkov A. V. Nechetkoe modelirovanie v srede MATLAB i fuzzyTECH [Fuzzy modeling in MATLAB and fuzzyTECH]. St. Petersburg, BHV Peterburg, 2005. 736 p. (in Russian).
  3. Arutyunyan A. S., Kovalenko A. V., Urtenov M. Kh. Neyrosetevye tekhnologii finansovo-ekonomicheskogo analiza. Ch. 3. Neyrosetevye tekhnologii [Neural network technologies for financial and economic analysis. Part 3. Neural network technologies]. Krasnodar, Kuban State Technological University Publ., 2015. 156 p. (in Russian).
  4. Buckley J., Feuring T., Eslami E. Fuzzy Mathematics in Economics and Engineering. Physica-Varlag. Heidelberg Physica, 2002. 272 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1795-9
  5. Baranovskaya T. P., Karmazin V. N., Utrenov M. Kh., Kovalenko A. V. Sovremennye matematicheskie metody analiza finansovo-ekonomicheskogo sostoyaniya predpriyatiya [Modern mathematical methods for analyzing the financial and economic state of an enterprise]. Krasnodar, KubSAU Publ., 2009. 235 p. (in Russian). EDN: TXJWKL
  6. Bojadziev G., Bojadziev M. Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance and Management. Advances in fuzzy systems. Vol. 12. Singapore, River Edge, NJ, World Scientific, 1997. 232 p. https://doi.org/10.1142/3312
  7. Zopoundisis C., Doumpos M. Multi-group discrimination using multi-criteria analysis: Illustrations from the field of finance. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, vol. 139, iss. 2, pp. 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00360-5
  8. Ivanishchev M. V. Development of a fuzzy-numerical method for forecasting and ensuring enterprise sustainability under conditions of uncertainty. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Econ.). Moscow, 2002. 138 p. (in Russian).
  9. Lutsenko E. V., Kovalenko A. V., Pechurina E. K., Urtenov M. A. H. Оpen personal intellectual technology for development and application of adaptive methods of assessment of investment attractiveness and creditworthiness of enterprises. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seria Ekonomika [Perm University Herald. Economy], 2019, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 20–50 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2019-1-20-50, EDN: NUHIJG
  10. Nedosekin A. O. Methodological basis for modeling financial activities using fuzzy set descriptions. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Econ.). St. Petersburg, 2003. 302 p. (in Russian).
  11. Thomas L. C. A survey of credit and behavioral scoring: Forecasting Financial risk of lending to consumers. International Journal of Forecasting, 2000, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 149−172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00034-0
  12. McCulloch W. S., Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. In: Shannon C. E., McCarthy J. (eds.) Automata studies. Princeton, NJ, Princeton Univsity Press, 1956. (Russ. ed.: Moscow, Ill, 1956, pp. 363−384).
  13. Xiao-Lin L., Zhong Yu. An overview of personal credit scoring: Techniques and future work. International Journal of Intelligence Science, 2012, vol. 2, pp. 181−189. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijis.2012.224024
  14. Ciampi F., Gordini N. Small enterprise default prediction modeling through artificial neural networks: An empirical analysis of Italian small enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 2013, vol. 51, iss. 1, pp. 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00376.x
  15. Giannopoulos V., Aggelopoulos E. Predicting SME loan delinquencies during recession using accounting data and SME characteristics: The case of Greece. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 2019, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1456
  16. Oliveira M. D. N. T., Ferreira F. A. F., Pérez-Bustamante Ilander G. O., Jalali M. S. Integrating cognitive mapping and MCDA for bankruptcy prediction in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, vol. 68, iss. 9, pp. 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0166-3
  17. Kim H. S., Sohn S. Y. Support vector machines for default prediction of SMEs based on technology credit. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, vol. 201, iss. 3, pp. 838−846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.036
  18. Abdou H. A. Genetic programming for credit scoring: The case of Egyptian public sector banks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, vol. 36, iss. 9, pp. 11402– 11417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.076
  19. Ong C. S. Huang J. J., Tzengb G. H. Building Credit Scoring Models Using Genetic Programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, vol. 29, iss. 1, pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.01.003
  20. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R. A., Stone C. J. Classifi cation and regression trees. Monterey, CA, Wadsworth & Brooks / Cole Advanced Books & Software, 1984. 358 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470
  21. Lee S., Choi K., Yoo D. Predicting the Insolvency of SMEs Using Technological Feasibility Assessment Information and Data Mining Techniques. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 23, art. 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239790
  22. Fedorova E. A., Musienko S. O., Fedorov F. Yu. Prediction of bankruptcy of small and mediumsized business entities in Russia. Finance & Credit, 2018, vol. 24, iss. 11 (779), pp. 2537–2552 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.24.11.2537, EDN: YOVLZZ
  23. Brezigar-Masten A., Masten I. CART-based selection of bankruptcy predictors for the logit model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, vol. 39, iss. 11, pp. 10153−10159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.125
  24. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, vol. 8, pp. 338−353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  25. Yazdi A. K., Hanne T., Wang Y. J., Wee H. A Credit Rating Model in a Fuzzy Inference System Environment. Algorithms, 2019, vol. 12, iss. 7, pp. 1−15. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12070139
  26. Zabolotskaya V. V. Finansovo-kreditnoe obespechenie deyatel’nosti sub”ektov malogo predprinimatel’stva v Rossii i za rubezhom [Financial and credit support for the activities of small businesses in Russia and abroad]. Krasnodar, Kuban State Technological University Publ., 2013. 207 p. (in Russian). EDN: UYUEZB
  27. Shevchenko I. V., Karmazin A. V., Kovalenko A. V. Assessing the creditworthiness of a small and mediumsized business using a fuzzy production system. Financial Analytics. Problems and Solutions, 2008, no. 2 (2), pp. 81–86. EDN: ICKFDB
  28. Endronova V. N., Khasyanova. S. Yu. Models for analyzing the creditworthiness of borrowers. Finance & Credit, 2002, no. 6 (96), pp. 9−15 (in Russian).
  29. Balcaen S., Ooghe H. Alternative methodologies in studies on business failure: Do they produce better results than the classic statistical methods? Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series (16). Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, 2004, pp. 1−44.
Received: 
07.05.2024
Accepted: 
10.06.2024
Available online: 
30.08.2024
Published: 
30.08.2024