Cite this article as:

Гусев В. В. Innovative Development of the Saratov Region: the Arguments «Pro» and «Contra». Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 263-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-3-262-268


Heading: 

Innovative Development of the Saratov Region: the Arguments «Pro» and «Contra»

Introduction. The article proposes to consider innovation not only as a factor of economic development, as well as a tool to resolve difficult conflicts and overcome the limitations that can not be overcome by other means. Theoretical analysis. In the process of development of economic systems they formed conservative structures that this development is stopped. The paper put forward the hypothesis that such contradictions are not solved structures of the economic system. And they themselves contradictions and limitations arising from them can be overcome only through external innovation. Empirical analysis. Through the prism of the proposed model of the innovation process is considered the economic evolution of the Saratov region. By bringing the various arguments given assessment of the innovation process in the Saratov region at the present stage. Results. It is concluded that the formation of the economic system in the Saratov region of the complex insoluble contradictions: the branch structure of the deformation, the uncertain position of the region in the nationwide system of division of labor, the lack of public resources, the unattractiveness of the region for investors, low quality of regional management. According to the authors, the resolution of conflicts and overcoming the limitations posed by them is only possible at the expense of external innovation.

References: 

1. Sukharev O. S. Evoliutsionnaia ekonomika, «neoklassika » i innovatsii: I. Shumpeter, Ya. Kornai i «effekt mody» v nauke [Evolutionary economics, «neoclassical» and Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter, J. Kornai and «fashion effect» in science]. Investitsii v Rossii [Investments into Russia], 2012, no. 7 (210), pp 34‒40.
2. Pertsik E. N. Goroda mira: geografi ia mirovoi urbanizatsii [Cities: geography global urbanization. Textbook for universities geographical specialties]. Moscow, International Relations Publ., 1999. 384 p.
3. Osipov R. A.Geosistemnaia paradigma kak innovatsiia v upravlenii regionom [Geosystem paradigm as an innovation in the management of the region]. Rossiiskoe obschestvo i gosudarstvo: regional’nye potentsialy modernizatsii [Russian society and the state: the modernization of the regional potentials: materials of All-Russian scientifi c-practical conference. Collection of scientifi c works]. Saratov, Volga Region Academy for Civil Service named after P. A. Stolypin, 2010, pp. 124‒126.
4. Osipov R. A. Agrarnyi sektor v evoliutsii otraslevoi struktury ekonomiki regiona (na primere Saratovskoi oblasti) [Agricultural sector in the evolution of the sectoral structure of the regional economy (on the example of the Saratov region)]. Nikonovskie chteniia [Nikonovsky readings], 2007, no. 12, pp. 117‒120.
5. Baida S. E. Prirodnye, tekhnogennye i biologo-sot si al’nye katastrofy: zakonomernosti vozniknoveniia, monitoring i prognozirovanie [Natural, technological and bio-social catastrophe: the law of occurrence, monitoring and forecasting]. Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute for Civil Defense and Emergency Situations of EMERCOM of Russia, 2013. 198 p.
6. Malyi V. I., Gusev V. V. Innovatsionnost’ razvitiia regiona: vzaimodeistvie gosudarstva, predpriiatii i universitetov (na primere Saratovskoi oblasti) [Innovative development of the region: the interaction of government, businesses and universities (on the example of the Saratov region)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal. Ser. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science], 2013, no. 1 (21), pp. 20‒37.

Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
одобрена к публикации
Short Text (PDF):