Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Manokhina N. V., Mityaeva N. V. Creativity: Myths and reality. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 4-15. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2025-25-1-4-15 , EDN: CHPEUT

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
331.5
EDN: 
CHPEUT

Creativity: Myths and reality

Autors: 
Manokhina Nadezhda Vasilievna, Saratov State University
Mityaeva Natalia V., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Formation processes of creativity as a universal competence are investigated from a comparative position and a theoretical methodological basis is developed for the debunking of myths about creativity. Theoretical analysis. Creativity is interpreted by the authors as a special ability of subjects (individuals, groups, organizations) to create something new, original, non-trivial. Theoretical approaches to the formation of creativity as the specialists’ personality trait and to the process of using this universal competence in the modern information society are generalized. Empirical analysis. The basic myths concerning the understanding and implementation of creativity in various spheres have been revealed and in fact preserved by science, substantiated arguments have been presented for their debunking, and modern new realities have been presented in the theory of creativity and its practical implementation. The author’s classification includes myths related to the sphere of creativity, the existence of a direct connection between intelligence and creativity, the spread of creativity in spheres and types of activity, the correlation of creativity levels and intelligence in society, the connection of creativity to innate and genetically inherited personality characteristics, the optimal time for acquiring creativity, characteristics of a person possessing creative skills, profitable types of activity, requiring the manifestation and realization of creative features. Results. The authors have proved that the need for creativity in general, from politics to private life, has grown rapidly and continues to grow, however; creativity as a human personality trait does not develop permanently, it is heterogeneous and segmented according to different types, forms and levels and the path of its development is complex, zigzag, and this fact creates a new field for interdisciplinary research.

Reference: 
  1. Guilford J. P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, vol. 5, iss. 9, pp. 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  2. Guilford J. P. Three facer of intellect. In: Matyushkin A. M. (ed.) Psikhologiya myshleniya [Psychology of thinking]. Moscow, Progress, 1965, pp. 433–457 (in Russian).
  3. Runco M. A., Jaeger G. J. The standard defi nition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2012, vol. 24, iss. 1, рр. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  4. Runco M. A. Everyone has creative potential. In: Sternberg R. J., Grigorenko E. L., Singer J. L. (eds.). Creativity: From potential to realization. American Psychological Association, 2004, pp. 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-002
  5. Runco M. A. Updating the standard definition of creativity to account for the artifi cial creativity of AI. Creativity Research Journal, 2023, vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977
  6. Kenett Y. N., Faust M. A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 2019, vol. 23, iss. 4, рр. 271–274. https://doi.org:/10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.007
  7. Green A. E., Beaty R. E., Kenett Y. N., Kaufman J. C. The process defi nition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2023, vol. 36, iss. 3, рр. 544–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
  8. Glăveanu V. P., Beghetto R. A. Creative experience: A non-standard defi nition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2020, vol. 33, iss. 2, pр. 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606
  9. Corazza G. E. Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic defi nition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2016, vol. 28, iss. 3, pp. 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
  10. Walia C. A dynamic defi nition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2019, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
  11. Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psikhologiya tvorcheskoy sposobnosti [Psychology of creative abilities]. Moscow, Publishing Center “Academy”, 2002. 320 p. (in Russian).
  12. Ponomarev Ya. A. Psikhologiya tvorcheskogo myshleniya [Psychology of creative thinking]. Moscow, Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the RSFSR Publ., 1960. 352 p. (in Russian).
  13. Filosofi ya tvorchestva: ezhegodnik. Vyp. 6. Filosofskometodologicheskiy analiz tvorcheskikh protsessov [Smirnova N. M., Beskova I. A. (ed.). Philosophy of creativity. Yearbook. Issue 6. Philosophical and methodological analysis of creative processes]. Moscow, Golos, 2020. 372 p. (in Russian).
  14. Novoselov S. A. Associate synectic technology of student’s creative development. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka [Pedagogical Education and Science], 2011, no. 1, pp. 72–82 (in Russian). EDN: OJLYHJ
  15. Long H. An empirical review of research methodologies and methods in creativity studies (2003–2012). Creativity Research Journal, 2014, vol. 26, iss. 4, pp. 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961781
  16. Guilford J. P. The nature of human intelligence. McGrawHill ser. in psychology. New York a.o., 1967. 538 p.
  17. Gruber H. On the hypothesized relation between giftedness and creativity. Feldman D. H. (ed.) New directions for child development: no. 17. Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1982, pp. 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219821704
  18. Psikhologiya tvorchestva: obshchaya, differentsial’naya, prikladnaya [Ponomarev Ya. A. (ed.) Psychology of creativity: General, differential, applied]. Moscow, Nauka, 1990. 224 p. (in Russian). EDN: XAIQXT
  19. Torrance E. P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Scholastic Testing Service, Inc., 1974. 48 p.
  20. Perkins D. N. Creative giftedness as a psychological concept. Social Sciences Abroad: Abstract Journal. Series 8. Science Studies, 1988, no. 4, pp. 88–92 (in Russian).
  21. Tulshenkova Z. To the question about the correlation of creativity and intellect. Vestnik of Moscow State Humanitarian University named after M. A. Sholohow. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2009, no. 3, pp. 27–32 (in Russian). EDN: MVYPZH
  22. Donskaya E. Razvitiye intellekta i kreativnosti: novye podkhody v psikhologii (Development of intelligence and creativity: New approaches in psychology). 2023. Available at: https://www.litres.ru/book/evgeniyadonskaya/razvitie-intellekta-i-kreati... (accessed November 20, 2024) (in Russian).
  23. Chernetsov P. I., Vinogradova T. I. The relationship between intelligence and creativity in adolescents. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 80–83 (in Russian). EDN: TKTOHP
  24. Dikaya L. A. Development of Creativity Among Experts in Counteraction to Terrorism and Elimination of the Consequences of Acts of Terrorism. Russian Psychological Journal, 2013, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 28–34.
  25. Homer-Dixon T. The upside of down: Catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Washington, DC, Island Press, 2006. 448 p.
  26. Flynn J. R. The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, vol. 95, iss. 1, pp. 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.29
  27. Flynn J. R. The WAIS-III and WAIS-IV: Daubert motions favor the certainly false over the approximately true. Applied Neuropsychology, 2009, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280902864360
  28. Sternber R. J. Intelligence. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. 2023, September 20. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.872
  29. Teasdale T. W., Owen D. R. A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, vol. 39, iss. 4, pp. 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.029
  30. Makarushina E. N. The phenomenon of creativity and creative work in the modern system of higher education. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya [Fundamental Research], 2011, no. 12-3, pp. 498–501 (in Russian). EDN: OVXWIL
Received: 
12.10.2024
Accepted: 
20.12.2024
Available online: 
31.03.2025
Published: 
31.03.2025