Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Baryshnikova N. A. Transaction costs’ impact on Russian agri-food system’s competitiveness and institutional structure in the context of the main value chains. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2026, vol. 26, iss. 2, pp. 118-132. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2026-26-2-118-132, EDN: BQRLGB

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
338.436:330.133.1
EDN: 
BQRLGB

Transaction costs’ impact on Russian agri-food system’s competitiveness and institutional structure in the context of the main value chains

Autors: 
Baryshnikova Natalya Anatolyevna, Saratov State Law Academy
Abstract: 

Introduction. In the context of increasing complexity and dynamism of the agri-food system functioning, the use of the transaction cost theory and the search for ways to reduce the cost are one of the most powerful reserves for increasing the agri-food system’s competitiveness and ensuring the country’s food security. Theoretical analysis. Transaction costs are of high importance in the context of the agri-food system’s development, institutional transformation, competitiveness and sustainability. They determine the formation of contractual relationships through an arsenal of interrelated institutions, and also play a key role in the analysis of pricing in value chains. Vertical integration, being a response to the imperfection of the institutional environment, reduces some of the market transaction costs, but strengthens the market power of large players. Еmpirical analysis. The level of transaction costs is up to 50% of the food retail price, and their structure reflects the specifics of food chains and is determined by a complex of institutional, technological and market factors. The dynamics of transaction costs has a significant impact on the product chains’ institutional structure transformation. Despite the fact that there is a mixed nature of institutional coordination in key product chains, the degree of assets consolidation and production concentration is growing. Results. The main factors driving the growth of transaction costs in the Russian agri-food system include the costs of information retrieval, negotiations, contract conclusion, performance monitoring, and logistics through intermediaries (transport, storage). Drivers of transaction cost growth against the background of uncertain market signals, asymmetry of interests between producers, exporters, processors and consumers, and sanctions pressure increase both market and government-induced transaction costs, which requires a set of measures development to reduce (optimize) them both at the micro level (firm level) and at the macro level (state agrarian policy level).

Reference: 
  1. Rodionova O. A. Transactional approach to the assessment of structural changes in intersectoral economic relations of agricultural entities. Economics of Agriculture of Russia, 2025, no. 12, pp. 65–70 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32651/2512-65, EDN: IQWJZB
  2. Volchik V. V., Nechaev A. D. Theoretical aspects to identification of transactional costs. Journal of Economic Regulation, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–38 (in Russian). EDN: SBMWUB
  3. Chang C.-Y., Ive G. A Comparison of two ways of applying transaction costs approach: Methodological debates. London, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, 2000. 31 p.
  4. Wallis J. J., North D. C. Measuring the transaction sector in the American economy: 1870–1970. In: Engerman S. L., Gallman R. E. (eds.) Long-term factors in American economic growth. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986, pp. 95–162.
  5. Furubotn E. G., Rihter R. Institutions and Economic Theory. The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1997. 542 p. (Russ. ed.: St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2005. 702 p.).
  6. Kotliarov I. D. Transaction cost and activity of economic agents. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2017, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 69–87 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.1.069-087, EDN: YHGXPJ
  7. Litvintseva G. P., Gakhova N. A. Dynamics of the transactional sector of the Russian economy: As taught by D. North. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 38–50 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2016.8.2.038-050, EDN: WBKAGZ
  8. Popov E. V. Transaktsii [Transactions]. Ekaterinburg, Ural Branch of the RAS Publ., 2011. 678 p. (in Russian). EDN: QCPSEX
  9. Barsukova S. Yu. Transaction costs of entering the small business market. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of Forecasting], 2000, no. 1, pp. 108–119 (in Russian). EDN: HRTDWV
  10. Radaev V. V. Formirovanie novykh rossiyskikh rynkov: transaktsionnye izderzhki, formy kontrolya i delovaya etika [Formation of new Russian markets: Transaction costs, forms of control and business ethics]. Moscow, Tsentr politicheskikh tekhnologiy, 1998. 328 р. (in Russian). EDN: SMQYHH
  11. Tambovtsev V. L. Transaction costs: Renderings and consequences. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2023, no. 1, pp. 18–32 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2023-1(100)-18-32, EDN: AVFLSE
  12. Kiryanov I. V. Quantitative analysis of transactional costs: Cardinal approach. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya [Problems of Management Theory and Practice], 2015, no. 3, pp. 125–135 (in Russian). EDN: TUGMON
  13. Gapon M. N. Management accounting of transaction costs on poultry farms. Siberian Financial School, 2013, no. 2 (97), pp. 76–79 (in Russian). EDN: PZHLIX
  14. Hockmann H., Gataulina E. The Significance of Market Transaction Costs, Technical Efficiency and Risk in Agriculture: An Empirical Analysis for Tatarstan Republic. 2012 Conference, August 18–24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil, International Association of Agricultural Economists. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.126676
  15. Wander A. E. The importance of transaction costs in agriculture – a review of selected empirical studies. Revista Brasileira de Planejamento e Desenvolvimento, 2013, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 118–129. https://doi.org/10.3895/rbpd.v2n2.3081
  16. Man N., Kadhim Z. R., Abd Latif I., Seng K. W. K. The role and importance of the transactions costs theory in agricultural contracting area: An appraisal of selected empirical studies. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 2017, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 79–89. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1901057989
  17. Valentinov V., Curtiss J. Toward a transaction cost theory of organization change in transitional agriculture. Eastern European Economics, 2005, vol. 43, iss. 5, pp. 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2005.11041116
  18. Maslova V. V., Zaruk N. F., Silaeva L. P., Avdeev M. V. The role of transaction costs in the pricing process in agriculture. Economics, Labor, Management in Agriculture, 2025, no. 10, pt. 1, pp. 73–84 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33938/25101-73, EDN: SPTKXP
  19. Stukach V. F., Astashova E. A., Shumakova O. V. Transaction costs in the agricultural market: Measurement, regulation, optimization. Omsk, Omsk State Agrarian University Publ., 2006. 212 p. (in Russian). EDN: ZBAIWD
  20. Bakov A. A., Zaruk N. F., Maslova V. V. Scientifi c approaches to determining transaction costs in the grain subsystem. Problems of AgriMarket, 2025, no. 3, pp. 94–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.46666/2025-3.2708-9991.08, EDN: MYAHLG
  21. Agnaeva I. Yu. Large agricultural holdings as a factor of sustainability of the agro-industrial complex of Russia in modern conditions. Russian Journal of Management, 2025, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 42–52 (in Russian). https:// doi.org/10.29039/2500-1469-2025-13-6-42-52, EDN: ADTFIN
Received: 
26.01.2026
Accepted: 
28.02.2026
Available online: 
01.06.2026
Published: 
01.06.2026