Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Pugachev I. O. World-system Approach to the Classification of the Models of Governmental Entrepreneurship. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 243-252. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-2-1-243-252

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
332.012.2; 338.242.4; 339.9.012

World-system Approach to the Classification of the Models of Governmental Entrepreneurship

Autors: 
Pugachev Ilya Olegovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. Model governmental entrepreneurship due to historical conditions of development, geographical location and the national specificities of countries. Research methodology. Governmental enterprise plays a key role in the concept of world-system analysis. Model governmental enterprise entrepreneurship determines the place of the governmental in the economic system and is determined by the country’s position in the international division of labor along the axis: power-hegemon – center – semi-periphery – periphery. Results of the study. The European model of governmental entrepreneurship – the model of the center of world-system. It is based on the terms for the fair allocation of revenues between the governmental, business and households. The USA, as the leader of world economy is a model of of governmental entrepreneurship, based on revenue from domestic sources and external sources, putting a monetary operation of the rest of the country. The model of governmental entrepreneurship of the countries of the periphery supply of economic resources in the regions, higher hierarchy in the global division of labor. Intermediate place between the American model of governmental entrepreneurship and model periphery countries occupied by the semi-periphery, including the Russian model of economy. Conclusion. Russia remains a semi-peripheral country with an exceptionally strong influence on the economy of the governmental entrepreneurship.

Reference: 
  1. Cheremisinov G. A. Gosudarstvennoe predpri nimatel’stvo v gody njepa (1921‒1932 gg.): avtoref. dis. doсt. ekon. nauk [Public enterprise in the years of the NEP (1921‒1932). Dr. econ. sci. thess diss.]. Volgograd, 2003. 39 p.
  2. Cheremisinov G. A. Paradigma direktivno-planovoy ekonomiki: rossiyskiy opyt hozyaystvennyh preobrazovaniy: v 2 ch. [Paradigm policy-planned economy: the Russian experience of economic transformations: in 2 pt.]. Saratov, 2012. Pt. 1. 348 p.
  3. Cheremisinov G.A. Paradigma direktivno-planovoy ekonomiki: rossiyskiy opyt hozyaystvennyh preobrazovaniy: v 2 ch. [Paradigm policy-planned economy: the Russian experience of economic transformations: in 2 pt.]. Saratov, 2013. Pt. 2. 460 p.
  4. Vallerstayn I. Analiz mirovyh sistem i situatsiya v sovremennom mire [The analysis of world systems and the situation in the modern world]. St.-Petersburg, 2001. 416 p.
  5. Vallerstayn I. Mirosistemnyj analiz: Vvedenie [Worldsystems analysis: an Introduction]. Moscow, 2006. 248 p.
  6. Raynert E. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How rich countries got rich… And why poor countries stay poor]. Moscow, 2011. 348 p.
  7. Arrigi Dzh. Dolgiy XX vek: Den’gi, vlast’ i istoki nashego vremeni [The long twentieth century: money, power and the origins of our time]. Moscow, 2006. 472 p.
  8. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie modeli i put’ Rossii: v 2 kn. [Socio-economic model and way of Russia]. Moscow. 2005. Pt. 1. 911 p.
  9. Ayvazov A. E. Periodicheskaya sistema mirovogo kapitalisticheskogo razvitiya (Periodic system of world capitalist development). Available at: http://ajvazov.ru/articles/periodicheskaya-sistema-mirovogokapitalisticheskogo-razvitiya.html (accessed 10 April 2012).
  10. Arrigi Dzh. Adam Smit v Pekine: Chto poluchil v nasledstvo XXI vek [Adam Smith in Beijing: What have inherited the XXI century]. Moscow, 2009. 456 p.
  11. Obuhov N. Uroki Bretton-Vudskoy valyutno-finansovoy sistemy [The lessons of Bretton woods monetary system]. Ekonomist, 2008, no. 11, pp. 83–92.
  12. Abdulgamidov N., Gubanov S. Dvoynye standarty odnopolyusno globalizatsii [Double standards unipolar globalization]. Ekonomist, 2002, no. 12, pp. 20–38.
  13. Ershov M. V. Mirovoy ekonomicheskiy krizis. Chto dal’she? [The World economic crisis. What’s next?]. Moscow, 2011. 295 p.
  14. Ryazanov V. T. Xozyajstvennyj stroj Rossii: na puti k drugoj e’konomike [The economic structure of Russia: on the path to another economy]. St.-Petersburg, 2009. 463 p.
  15. Tugan-Baranovskij M. I. Osnovy politicheskoj ekonomiki [Principles of political economy]. Petrograd, 1917. 540 р.
  16. Tugan-Baranovskiy M. I. Izbrannoe. Russkaya fabrika v proshlom i nastoyaschem. Istoricheskoe razvitie russkoy fabriki v XIX veke [Favorites. Russian factory in the past and the present. The historical development of the Russian factory in XIX century]. Moscow, 1997. 735 p.
  17. Cheremisinov G. A. Gosudarstvennoe predpri nimatel’stvo kak tipologicheskij priznak razvitija jekonomiki Rossii: teoretiko-metodologicheskij aspekt [Govemental enterprishup as a sign of typological development of the Russian economy: theoretical and methodological aspects]. Izv. Saratov Univ. New Ser. Ser. Economics. Management. Law. 2007, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 31‒45.
  18. Brodel’ F. Vremya mira. Material’naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV–XVIII vv.: v 3 t. [The time in the world. Material civilization, economy and capitalism, the XV‒XVIII centuries: in 3 vol.]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 1992. 678 p.
  19. Hazin M. Sravnitel’nye dannye po ekonomike SSSR i SShA (Comparative data on economy of the USSR and the USA). Available at: http://worldcrisis.ru/crisis/1154149 (accessed 20 October 2013).
Received: 
21.04.2014
Accepted: 
12.05.2014