Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Andreev A. V. Withholding of Competitive Advantage Dairy Enterprises at the Local Level. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 542-551. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-3-542-551

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
658+338.45:664

Withholding of Competitive Advantage Dairy Enterprises at the Local Level

Autors: 
Andreev Andrey Vladimirovich, Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Administration of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract: 

Introduction. Local (municipal and district) level is represented by the largest number of dairy companies to whom there is a problem retaining competitive advantage. Empirical analysis. The article proves that the dairy plant of this type can offer a combination of competitive advantages, appropriate conditions as the territory of the dislocation, and the presence of specific resources. To analyze the influence of the conditions of location dairy enterprise introduced the concept of «double effect of access» by which the detected difference in the effect of competitive forces – farms, suppliers and consumers. Multidirectional vector of these forces allows us to determine the influence of factors of heterogeneity and sluggishness of the local market to choose from a combination of competitive advantages. Empirical analysis of the dairy enterprises at this level showed that the best adaptation achieves enterprise operating in a deficit of raw milk and a large market sales, rather than vice versa. This company creates the optimal mechanism of transaction management with farms, suppliers and activities focuses on a combination of competitive advantages – the saturation range and low cost. Results. Dairy plant with a rich nomenclature usually develops broad functional abilities, looking for ways to isolate the power advantages, uses a strategy of «narrow differentiation», reaching on a background of rivals high economic results.

Reference: 
  1. Khan D. Planirovanie i kontrol’: kontseptsiya kontrollinga [Planning and control: the concept of controlling]. Moscow, Finance and Statistics Publ., 1997. 800 p.
  2. Andreev A. V. Formirovanie konkurentnykh preimushchestv predpriiatii pishchevoi promyshlennosti: teoriia i praktika [Formation of the competitive advantages of the food industry: theory and practice]. Nauchnoe obozrenie [Science Review], 2012, no 4, pp. 316–327.
  3. Porter M. Konkurentnaja strategija: Metodika analiza otraslej i konkurentov [Competitive Strategy: Technique for Analyzing Industries and competitors]. Moscow, Alpina Business Books Publ., 2005. 454 p.
  4. Andreev A. V. Formirovanie ustoychivoy konkurentnoy pozitsii predpriyatiy molochnoy promyshlennosti na lokal’nom urovne [Creating sustainable competitive position dairy enterprises at the local level]. ETAP: Jekonomicheskaja teorija, analiz, praktika [ETAP: Economic theory, analysis, and practice], 2014, no. 1, pp. 58–73.
  5. O zashhite konkurencii: federal’nyj zakon ot 26 ijunja 2006 g. № 135-FZ (On protection of competition. Federal law of June 26, 2006, № 135-FZ). Available at: http:// www.fas.gov.ru/legislative-acts/legislative-acts_9498. html (accessed 20 Avgust 2014).
  6. Marshall A. Osnovy ekonomicheskoy nauki [Principles of economics]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008. 832 p.
  7. Seregin S. N., Kashirina O. N., Kolonchin K. V. Printsipy i osobennosti territorial’nogo razmeshcheniya proizvodstvennoy bazy pishchevoy promyshlennosti Rossii [Principles and features of territorial distribution of food industry production base in Russia]. Jekonomika sel’skohozjajstvennyh i pererabatyvajushhih predprijatij [Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises], 2011, no. 10, pp. 12–19.
  8. Williamson O. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma: Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, «relational» contracting]. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat, 1996. 702 p.
  9. Andreev A. V. Sposoby ukrepleniya konkurentnoy pozitsii molokopererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy na regional’nom urovne [Ways to strengthen the competitive position of milk processing enterprises at the regional level]. Izvestya of Saratov University. New Ser. Ser. Economics. Management. Lаw, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 1, pt. 1, pp. 71–79.
  10. Grazhdanskij Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (GK RF) Chast’ 2 ot 01 marta 1996 (Civil code of the Russian Federation (CC RF). Part 2 01 March 1996). Available at: http://base.garant.ru/10164072/ (accessed 20 Avgust 2014).
  11. Grant R. M. Resursnaja teorija konkurentnyh preimushhestv: prakticheskie vyvody dlja formulirovanija strategii [Resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation]. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 8. Management, 2003, iss. 3 (24), pp. 47–75.
  12. Rybalova T. I. Rynok upakovannogo moloka [Packaged milk market]. Molochnaja promyshlennost’ [Dairy industry], 2014, no. 1, pp. 7–9.
Received: 
24.04.2014
Accepted: 
22.07.2014