Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Ryzhenkov A. J. The Principle of Priority of Protection of Land as a Component of Environmental Environment before it Can Be Used as a Real Estate and Its Implementation in Judicial Practice. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 205-211. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2017-17-2-205-211

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon 2-2017_ekonomika.12.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Law
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
349.41
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2017-17-2-205-211

The Principle of Priority of Protection of Land as a Component of Environmental Environment before it Can Be Used as a Real Estate and Its Implementation in Judicial Practice

Autors: 
Ryzhenkov Anatoly J., Kalmyk State University named after B. B. Gorodovikova
Abstract: 

Introduction. In article one of the basic principles of the land right mentioned in Art. 1 of the Land code of the Russian Federation, the fixing priority of protection of the earth as the most important component of the environment and means of production in agricultural industry and forestry before use of the earth as a fast estate is investigated. Theoretical analysis. This principle means that possession, use and the order of the earth are carried out by owners of the land plots freely if it does not cause an environmental damage. Investigating this principle, the author notes that requirements for protection of the earth as natural object are designed for large land massifs, and establish features of protection of the whole categories of lands. From this the special requirements distributed to owners of the concrete land plots follow. Results. The author reasons a conclusion that uniform requirements neither for protection, nor for use of the land plots which equally would extend to all categories of lands do not exist. Conclusion. Having investigated the mechanism of realization of the principle of a priority of protection of the earth as environment component before its use as fast estate, the author reveals a number of the mutual rights and obligations of bodies of the public power and land users, with fixing of measures of responsibility for violation with the last of norms and rules, and limiting the rights of owners of the land real estate.

Key words: 
principle of law
agriculture
forestry
responsibility
land preservation
environment
litigation
Reference: 
  1. Zemel’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 25.10.2001 № 136-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) (Land code of the Russian Federation of the Russian Federation of 25.10.2001 No. 136-FZ (an edition of 03.07.2016)). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  2. Konstitutsiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii (priniata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) [The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended of 30.12.2008 No. 6-FKZ, of 30.12.2008 No. 7-FKZ, of 05.02.2014 No. 2-FKZ, of 21.07.2014 No. 11-FKZ)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398 (in Russian).
  3. Ob okhrane okruzhaiuschey sredy: federal’nyi zakon ot 10.01.2002 № 7-FZ (About Environmental Protection. Federal law of 10.01.2002 No. 7-FZ). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  4. Аnisimov A. P., Zemliakova G. L. Sootnoshenie kategoriy «ispol’zovanie zeme’l» i «okhrana zemel’»: diskussionnie voprosi [Correlation of categories «use of lands» and «protection of lands»: disputable issues]. Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii [Vestnik Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia], 2013, no. 2 (25), pp. 26–31 (in Russian).
  5. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Respubliki Belarus o zemle [The comment to the Code of Republic of Belarus on the earth. By total. ed. S. A. Balachenko, N. A. Shingel]. Minsk, 2009. 720 p. (in Russian).
  6. Harkov V. N. Оrganizatsionno-pravovoe obespechenie ratsional’nogo ispol’zovania i okhrany zeme’l na urovne sub#ekta RF (na materialakh Tverskoy oblasti) [Organizational legal support of rational use and protection of lands at the level of the territorial subject of the Russian Federation (on materials of the Tver region). Cand. jur. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 1998. 212 p. (in Russian).
  7. Harkov V. N. Pravovye problemy okhrany zemel’ [Legal problems of protection of lands]. Izvestiya Тul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universitetata. Economicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki [Proceedings of the TSU. Economic and legal sciences], 2013, iss. 2, pt. II, pp. 214–222 (in Russian).
  8. Gosudarstvennyi (natsional’nyi) doklad о sostoianii i ispol’zovanii zemel’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii в 2014 gody [The state (national) report on a state and use of lands in the Russian Federation in 2014]. Мoscow, 2015. 224 p. (in Russian).
  9. Ob oborote zemel’ sel’skokhoziaystvennogo naznacheniya: federal’nyi zakon ot 24.07.2002 № 101 (About land turnover of agricultural purpose. Federal law of 24.07.2002 No. 101). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  10. O gosudarstvennom regulirovanii obespecheniya plodorodiya zemel’ sel’skokhoziaystvenno go naznacheniya: federal’nyi zakon ot 16.07.1998 № 101-FZ (About state regulation of ensuring fertility of lands of agricultural purpose. Federal law of 16.07.1998 No. 101-FZ). ATP «Garant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  11. Postanovlenie Аrbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 26.01.2016 № Ф05-19540/2015 po delu № А40- 17353/15 (The resolution of Arbitration tribunal of the Moscow district of 26.01.2016 No. F05-19540/2015 in the matter of No. A40-17353/15). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  12. Аpelliatsionnoe opredelenie Samarskogo oblastnogo suda ot 19.11.2012 po delu № 33-10526 (Appeal defi nition of the Samara regional court of 19.11.2012 in the matter of No. 33-10526). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  13. Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 29.03.2011 po delu № А12-13851/2010 (The FAS determination of the Volga region district of 29.03.2011 in the matter of No. A12-13851/2010). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource] (in Russian).
  14. Sukhova Е. А. Problemy realizatsii printsipa prioriteta okhrany zemli kak vazhneishego komponenta okruzhauschei sredy pered ee ispol’zovaniem v katchestve nedvizhimogo imuschestva [Problems of realization of the principle of a priority of protection of the earth as most important component of the environment before its use as a fast estate]. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern law], 2014, no. 7, pp. 4–8 (in Russian).
  15. Аrtamonov А. А. Оkhrana zemel’ sel’skokhoziaystvennogo naznacheniya munitsipal’nymi i provintsial’nymi organami vlasti Kanady [Protection of lands of agricultural purpose by municipal and provincial authorities of Canada]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Review. Series Humanities], 2014, iss. 8 (136), pp. 186–189 (in Russian).
Received: 
17.01.2017
Accepted: 
14.02.2017