Cite this article as:

Lisyutkin A. B., Arkhipova E. Y. The Normative Bases of Legalization of Non Jurisdictional Process. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 338-?. DOI:


The Normative Bases of Legalization of Non Jurisdictional Process

Introduction. Globalization and regionalizations of social and economic communications caused contradictory changes in legal system of the Russian Federation. It is receive an ambiguous assessment in legal science and practice. So there is an introduction of not traditional categories for jurisprudence in legal practice, one of which is non jurisdictional process. Theoretical analysis. The formation of the concept of the normative bases of non jurisdictional process will promote detection of dependences between rules of legislation and its practice. The materialization of non jurisdictional process can be carried out in borders of realization of the right. It is possible because of indirect legal fixing in the legislation. Therefore legitimate interests of owners are limits of legalization of non jurisdictional process. Non jurisdictional forms of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests are applied in the international and state public and private law. Therefore, the object of analysis is different legal acts. Conclusion. This analysis allows to claim that the legislation of Russian Federation contains the provisions allowing and providing legalization of non jurisdictional process in legal system of the Russian Federation. It plays a role of the normative bases of introduction of non jurisdictional process legal practice. Legal rules are allow to consider the non jurisdictional process as one of components of the mechanism of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the person. In this sense the problem of not jurisdictional process is interdisciplinary.


1. Lisjutkin A. B., Tonkonogova E. Yu. K voprosu o prirode neiurisdiktsionnogo processa: logiko-gnoseologicheskii aspekt [The nature of non jurisdictional process: logiko gnoseological aspect]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law,.2015, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 211–220.
2. Arhipova E. Yu. Problema sootnosheniia processual’noi formy, iuridicheskoi protsedury i iuridicheskogo processa [The problem of a correlation of the form of action, legal procedure and legal process]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii [Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin], 2015, no. 4 (105), pp. 152–155.
3. Arhipova E. Yu. Rol’ neiurisdikcionnogo processa v pravovoi zhizni rossiiskogo obschestva [The role of non jurisdictional process in legal life of Russian society]. Pravovaia politika i pravovaia zhizn’ [Legal policy and legal life], 2016, no. 1, pp. 110–114.

4. Pavlushina A. A. Teoriia iuridicheskogo processa: itogi, problemy, perspektivy razvitiia [Theory of legal process: results, problems, development]. Samara, Samara State Economic Akademy Publ., 2005. 480 p.
5. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast’ pervaia) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. ot 31.01.2016) [Civil code of Russian Federation (part one) of 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (an edition of 31.01.2016)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1994, no. 32, art. 3301.
6. Trudovoi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 30.12.2001 № 197-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) [Labor code of Russian Federation of 30.12.2001 № 197-FZ (an edition of 30.12.2015]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 1 (pt. 1), art. 3.
7. Tamozhennyi kodeks Tamozhennogo Soiuza ot 27.11.2009 (red. ot 08.05.2015) (prilozhenie k Dogovoru o Tamozhennom kodekse Tamozhennogo soiuza, priniatomu Resheniem Mezhgosudarstvennogo Soveta EvrAzeS na urovne glav gosudarstv ot 27.11.2009 № 17) [Customs code of the Customs union of 27.11.2009 (an edition of 08.05.2015)] // Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2010, no. 50, art. 6615.
8. Pis’mo Federal’noi tamozhennoi sluzhby Rossii ot 29.09.2006 № 01-06/34176 «O napravlenii metodicheskikh rekomendatsii» (Letter of the Federal Customs Service of 29.09.2006 № 01-06/34176 «About the directions of methodical recommendations»). BestPravo. ru. Directory portal. Available at: http://russia.bestpravo. ru/fed2008i/data041/tex041455/list3.htm (accessed 4 February 2016).
9. Konstitutsiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii (priniata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitucii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ [The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote 12.12.1993) (with the amendments introduced by Laws of the Russian Federation on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, of 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, of 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, of 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398.
10. Ob obschih printsipakh organizacii mestnogo samoupravleniia Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal’nyi zakon ot 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) [About the general principles of the organization of local government of the Russian Federation. Federal law of 06.10.2003 № 131-FZ (an edition of 30.12.2015)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2003, no. 40, art. 3822.
11. Lisanjuk E. N. Logicheskie aspekty prezumptsii sistemnosti prava [Logical aspects of presumptions of systemacity of the law]. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence], 2014, no. 1, pp. 43–54.
12. Zenin I. V. Pravo Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii [The law of The World Trade Organization]. Moscow, Jurait Publ., 2014. 792 p.
13. Marrakeshskaia deklaratsiia [rus., angl.] (Priniata v g. Marrakeshe 15.04.1994) (Marrakesh declaration). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].

Full Text (PDF): 
Short Text (PDF):