Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Cheremisinov G. A. The evolution of the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm in contemporary political economy of Japan. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 4, pp. 346-362. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2025-25-4-346-362, EDN: CMNIEU

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
330.8
EDN: 
CMNIEU

The evolution of the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm in contemporary political economy of Japan

Autors: 
Cheremisinov Georgy Aleksandrovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The modern scientific galaxy of Japanese economists maintained the continuity of theoretical views and predetermined the vector of “Westernization” in the evolution of the “Flying Wild Geese” conceptual paradigm. Scientific review. Since the 1960s, Japan has established itself as an industrially developed trading power. In the 1980s, the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm became a model for East Asia. Japan managed regional economic relations, implemented a cooperation program, being the world’s largest distributor of aid, and reserved funds for neighboring countries. In the role of the “leading goose” of East Asia, Japanese economy introduced new products and technologies, expanded the area of regional division of labor, and increased imports and exports. The scientific work of K. Kojima affected the understanding of changes in the Japanese, East Asian and world economies of the last third of the XX century. The scientist’s conceptual schemes explained the relationship between the increase in foreign direct investment by Japanese corporations, the development of international labor division, trade and integration, and the economic growth of Asian countries in chronological and hierarchical order. S. Okita made a major contribution to promoting the “Flying Wild Geese” model in the global political and economic discourse. T. Ozawa proved that Japan had achieved success by relying on the use of its traditional moral and social values in state economic policy and the organization of entrepreneurial activity. S. Kasahara studied the problems of international policy of economic development and trade, the role of the state in industrialization, integration, and development of East Asian countries within the framework of the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm. Conclusion. The conducted research showed the historical and economic conditionality of the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm evolution in the modern political economy of Japan.

Reference: 
  1. Cheremisinov G. A. The conceptual basis of Japanese modern political economy: “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 240–249 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-3-240-249, EDN: ABWKJM
  2. Akamatsu K. A Theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv: Zeitschrift des Instituts für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel. Tübingen, Mohr, 1961, № 86, pp. 196–217.
  3. Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies, 1962, vol. 1, iss. s1, pp. 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17461049.1962.tb01020.x
  4. Ozawa T. Institutions, industrial upgrading, and economic performance in Japan: The “fl ying-geese” paradigm of catch-up growth. Cheltenham, U.K., Edward Elgar, 2005. 234 p.
  5. Kasahara S. The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Model. UNCTAD Discussion Papers № 213. Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. iii + 30 p.
  6. Kasahara S. A Critical Evaluation of the Flying Geese Paradigm: The evolving framework of the model and its application to East Asian regional development and beyond. Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the Rector Magnifi cus and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board. Erasmus University Rotterdam. 2019, December 19. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/123636.
  7. Cheremisinov G. A., Pugachev I. O. Vozdeystvie gosudarstvennogo predprinimatel’stva na makroekonomicheskuyu dinamiku sovremennoy Rossii [The impact of state enterprise on the macroeconomic dynamics of modern Russia]. Moscow, Pero, 2020. 236 p. (in Russian). EDN: KUQUAV
  8. Kojima К. The “fl ying geese” model of Asian economic development: Origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 2000, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(00)00067-1
  9. Schröppel C., Nakajima M. The Changing Interpretation of the Flying Geese Model of Economic Development. Japanstudien, 2003, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09386491.2003.11826895
  10. Ozawa T. Professor Kiyoshi Kojima’s Contributions to FDI Theory: Trade, Growth, and Integration in East Asia. The International Economy, 2007, vol. 2007, iss. 11, pp. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.5652/internationaleconomy.2007.17
  11. Okita S. The emerging prospects for development and the world economy : 3rd Raul Prebisch Lecture July 1987. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Geneva, Switzerland, 1987. 12 p.
  12. Stiglitz J. Yu. Globalizausiya: trevozhnye tendentsii [Globalization: Alarming trends]. Moscow, Mysl, 2003. 300 p. (in Russian).
  13. Ozawa T. The “Hidden” Side of the “Flying-Geese” Model of Catch-Up Growth: Japan’s Dirigiste Institutional Setup and a Deepening Financial Morass. Economics Study Area Working Papers 20. Honolulu, Hawaii, East-West Center, 2001. 30 p.
Received: 
12.08.2025
Accepted: 
30.09.2025
Available online: 
25.12.2025
Published: 
25.12.2025