Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Cheremisinov G. A. The conceptual basis of Japanese modern political economy: “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2024, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 240-249. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2024-24-3-240-249, EDN: ABWKJM

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
330.8
EDN: 
ABWKJM

The conceptual basis of Japanese modern political economy: “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm

Autors: 
Cheremisinov Georgy Aleksandrovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The successful historical experience of modernizing Japanese economy, which managed to become one of the world economy leaders, found theoretical and methodological justification in the “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm formulated by K. Akamatsu. Scientific review. The introduction of a wide range of readers to the concept of uneven economic growth in advanced and developing countries occurred after the publication of K. Akamatsu’s articles in English in the 1960s. The methodology of the Japanese scientist was influenced by his studying German philosophic and economic thought. The “Flying Wild Geese” paradigm was built on the basis of the long wave of economic conjuncture theory by the Russian economist N. D. Kondratiev and included three models. The first model described the following sequence: import – domestic production – export. The second model explained the transition of production from consumer goods to capital goods and from simple and unprocessed products to complex and processed products. The third model showed the hierarchy of countries in the world economy in accordance with the stages of economic growth. Economic development is encouraged by contradictions and takes place in the form of the alternating emergence and resolution of contradictions of supply and demand. Industrial innovations create a contradiction in the comparative cost structure of national economies and stimulate the growth of international trade. The spread of innovations eliminates the resulting contradiction and slows down economic development. The main contradictions of development, cyclical dynamics and structural shifts correspond to the policy of progressive development, cyclical stabilization policy and structural coordination policy. Conclusion. The conducted research has shown the theoretical and methodological origins and foundations of modern economic thought in Japan.

Reference: 
  1. Akamatsu K. A Theory of unbalanced growth in the world economy. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv : Zeitschrift des Instituts für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel. Tübingen, Mohr, 1961, no. 86, pp. 196–217.
  2. Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. The Developing Economies, 1962, vol. 1, iss. s1, pp. 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1962.tb01020.x
  3. Kasahara S. The Flying Geese Paradigm. A Critical Study of its Application to East Asian Regional Development. UNCTAD Discussion Papers № 169. Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. 27 p.
  4. Kasahara S. The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Model. UNCTAD Discussion Papers № 213. Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. 30 p.
  5. Kasahara S. A Critical Evaluation of the Flying Geese Paradigm: The evolving framework of the model and its application to East Asian regional development and beyond. Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the Rector Magnificus and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board. Erasmus University Rotterdam. 2019, December 19. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/123636
  6. Ozawa T. Institutions, industrial upgrading, and economic performance in Japan: The “flying-geese” paradigm of catch-up growth. Cheltenham, U.K., Edward Elgar, 2005. 234 p.
  7. Nurkse R. Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford, Basil Blackwel, 1953. 163 p.
  8. Myrdal G. Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London, Gerald Duckworth, 1957. 167 p.
  9. Schröppel C., Nakajima M. The Changing Interpretation of the Flying Geese Model of Economic Development. Japanstudien, 2003, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09386491.2003.11826895
  10. Kondratiev N. D. Long-term cycles of conjuncture. Voprosy kon”yunktury: stat’i, referaty, zamenki, bibliografiya [Kondratiev N. D. (ed.) Current issues: articles, abstracts, notes, bibliography]. Vol. 1, iss. 1. Moscow, Finansovoe izdatel’stvo NKF SSSR, 1925, pp. 28–66 (in Russian).
  11. Kondratieff N. Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur. Archiv fur Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Bd. 56. Tübingen, 1926, S. 573–609 (in German).
  12. Schumpeter J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York, London, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1939. 461 p.
  13. List F. Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoy ekonomii [National system of political economy]. Moscow, Chelyabinsk, Sotsium, 2017. 451 p. (in Russian)
Received: 
08.04.2024
Accepted: 
20.05.2024
Available online: 
30.08.2024
Published: 
30.08.2024