Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


For citation:

Kasaeva T. G. The Analysis of Some Doctrines of Law in the Light of the Present. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 2, pp. 205-209. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-2-205-209

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
340

The Analysis of Some Doctrines of Law in the Light of the Present

Autors: 
Kasaeva Tamara G., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The object of the research in the article is the question of essence of law in modern science. The author in the research is guided by the analysis of various political and legal doctrines of law and state, allocating natural and legal, historical, normativity, psychological, sociological, Marxist-Leninist, realistic schools of law. Theoretical analysis. Emergence of this or that school of law is proved by political, economic and cultural changes taking place during a particular historical period. The analysis of the main doctrines of law and state since antiquity to the present day is carried out in search of a universal approach to the understanding of law. Empirical analysis. An attempt of logical, system description of the main schools of law from the perspective of practical usefulness and theoretical integrity is made. From this point of view, the essence of law within finding of a common ground of absolute and positive law is investigated. The main conclusions of the research are criticism of pluralism of views of the essence of law which developed in science and justification of the uniform approach to the essence of law within modern standard understanding of law. Results. Within modern standard understanding of law, law is a set of obligatory, formal and certain rules of conduct (rules of law) authorized by the state and expressing class and universal character; it is one of the most democratically justified regulators of the public relations.

Reference: 
  1. Bajtin M. I. Suschnost’ prava (Sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov) [The essence of law (Modern standard understanding of law on the verge of two centuries). 2nd ed. add.]. Moscow, 2005. 544 p. (in Russian).
  2. Pukhta G. F. Istoriya rimskogo prava [History of Roman Law]. Moscow, 1864. 586 p. (in Russian).
  3. Entsiklopediya prava [The Encyclopedia of Law]. Yaroslavl, 1872. 99 p. (in Russian).
  4. Savin’I F. K. Obiazatel’stvennoe pravo [Liability Law]. Moscow, 1876. 620 p. (in Russian).
  5. Iering R. fon. Dukh rimskogo prava na razlichnykh stupeniakh ego razvitiya [Spirit of Roman Law at Various Steps of Its Development. Translated from the 3rd ed. Pt. 1.]. St. Petersburg, 1875. 520 p. (in Russian).
  6. Juridicheskaia tekhnika [Legal Equipment]. St. Petersburg, 1905. 106 p. (in Russian).
  7. Iering R. fon. Bor’ba za pravo [The Struggle for Law]. St. Petersburg, 1872. 78 p. (in Russian).
  8. Iering R. fon. Tsel’ v prave [Law as a Means to an End]. St. Petersburg, 1881. 346 p. (in Russian).
  9. Kel’zen G. Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure Theory of Law]. Collection of translations. Issue 1. Moscow, 1987. 195 p. (in Russian).
  10. Kel’zen G. Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure Theory of Law]. Collection of translations. Issue 2. Moscow, 1988. 213 p. (in Russian).
  11. Javich L. S. Obschaia teoriya prava [The General Theory of Law]. Moscow, 1976. 298 p. (in Russian).
  12. Pound R. Interpretation of Legal History. Cambridge (Mass), 1946. 591 p.
  13. Pound R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven, 1961. 186 p.
  14. Frank J. Law and the Modern Mind. Princeton, 1949. 262 p.
  15. Llewellyn K. A Realistic Jurisprudence – the Next Step. Columbia Law Review, 1930, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 62–94.
  16. Marks K., Engel’s F. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works: in 50 vols.]. Vol. 4. Moscow, 1974. 646 p. (in Russian).
  17. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Complete Works: in 54 vols.]. Vol. 33. St. Petersburg, 1960. 486 p. (in Russian).
  18. Nersesjanc V. S. Pravo: mnogoobrazie opredeleniy i edinstvo poniatiy [Law: Variety of Defi nitions and Unity of Concepts]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet State and Law], 1983, no. 10, pp. 26–35 (in Russian).
  19. Nersesjanc V. S. Pravo i zakon. Iz istorii pravovykh ucheniy [Law and act of Law. From History of Legal Doctrines]. Moscow, 1983. 366 p. (in Russian).
  20. Nersesjanc V. S. Pravo – matematika svobody. Opyt proshlogo i perspektivy [Law – Mathematics of Freedom. Experience of the Past and Prospects]. Moscow, 1996. 158 p. (in Russian).
  21. Livshic R. Z. Teoriya prava [Theory of Law]. Moscow, 1994. 224 p. (in Russian).
  22. Mal’cev G. V. Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ i pravo [Social Justice and Law]. Moscow, 1977. 226 p. (in Russian).
  23. Mal’cev G. V. Ponimanie prava. Podkhody i problemy [Understanding of Law. Approaches and Problems]. Moscow, 1999. 420 p. (in Russian).
  24. Tenenbaum V. O. O suschnosti prava [About Essence of Law]. Pravovedenie, 1980, no. 1, pp. 35–42 (in Russian).
  25. Luchkov V. V. O nekotorykh aspektakh diskussii o sovremennom pravoponimanii [About Some Aspects of a Discussion about Modern Understanding of Law]. Vektor nauki TGU. Ser. Juridicheskie nauki [Vector of Science of the Tolyatti State University. Ser. Jurisprudence], 2010, no. 1, pp. 42–44 (in Russian).
  26. Sorokin V. V. O pliuralisticheskom ponimanii prava [About Pluralistic Understanding of Law]. Juridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka [Legal Education and Science], 2007, no. 3, pp. 41–43 (in Russian).
Received: 
10.04.2019
Accepted: 
14.05.2019