Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Ermasova N. B. Tax Reform of Corporate Income Tax on State Level in the USA. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 127-132. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2013-13-2-127-132

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
(downloads: 0)
Article type: 
336; 336.63, 338.012

Tax Reform of Corporate Income Tax on State Level in the USA

Ermasova Natalia Borisovna, Governors State University

Introduction. In proposing reforms for the corporate income taxation, it is necessary to consider the incentives generated by the current system of taxation and the effects that changing those incentives would have the significant impact on the economic behavior. Analysis. This paper proves that economic development policies and reform of income corporate taxation can significantly affects the growth of a state area, that increases in the growth of a local economy can benefits the overall national economy. Corporate income taxation can hinder the competitiveness of domestic industry by discouraging local investment in favor of investment in areas where corporate income tax rates are lower or where the tax is not levied. There are the examples of tax reforms of corporate income tax in States of Kansas, North Caroline, Michigan. Conclusion. This paper shows that R&D tax credits and State Business Tax Incentive Programs have significant and positive impacts on the growth of high-technology sector in the states.

  1. Brunori D., Bell M. E., Cordes J., Bing Y. Tax and Expenditure Limitations and Their Effects on Local Finances and Urban Areas. Urban and Regional Policy and Its Effects, ed. by Margery Austin Turner, Howard Wial, and Hal Wolman. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2008, pp. 109–154.
  2. Knoll M. S. The Corporate Income Tax and the Competitiveness of U.S. Industries Univ. of Pennsylvania Institute for Law and Economics, Research Paper Series № 09-01. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1330434 (accessed 7 May 2013).
  3. Randolph W. C. International Burdens of the Corporate Income Tax. Congressional Budget Offi ce Working Paper Series. August 2006. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/75xx/doc7503/200... (accessed 7 May 2013).
  4. Tax policy decisions ahead: President-elect Obama’s call for change.(2008) Deloitte Tax LLP. Available at: http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/attach/177/177534_Deloitte%20-%20Obama%20Ta... (accessed 8 May 2013).
  5. Yonghong Wu. State R&D Tax Credits and High-Technology Establishments. Economic Development Quarterly, 2008, no. 22, pp. 136–148.
  6. North Carolina Department of Commerce. (2000). Eligibility requirements for Lee Act credits. Available at: http://www.nccommerce.com/finance/incentives/tax/LeeEligibility3.doc (accessed 15 November 2011).
  7. North Carolina Department of Commerce. Reexamination of North Carolina tier enterprise formula. Available at: http://www.nccommerce.com/categories/ws_lee.htm (accessed 15 November 2011).
  8. North Carolina Department of Commerce. (2002). 2002 tier designations. Available at: http://www.nccommerce.com/finance/tiers/2002tiers.asp, (accessed 15 November 2011).
  9. North Carolina Department of Revenue. (2000). Tax rate and basis for the tax. Available at: http://www.dor.state.nc.us/taxes/corporate/rate.html (accessed 13 December 2001).
  10. Tax Foundation. (2013). Available at: http://www.taxfoundation.org/commentary/show/1409.html (accessed 10 April 2013).
  11. Tax Foundation (2013). Available at: http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/2165.html (accessed 10 April 2013).
  12. Michigan Business Tax MBT Web site. (2013). Available at: www.michigan.gov/MBT (accessed 10 April 2013).
  13. Auerbach A. J. Tax Reform, Capital Allocation, Efficiency and Growth, in Henry J. Aaron and William G. Gale. Economic Effects of Fundamental Tax Reform. Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 1996, pp. 29–73.
  14. Slemrod J. Is Tax Reform Good for Business? Is a ProBusiness Tax Policy Good for America? Fundamental Tax Reform, ed. John W. Diamond and George R. Zodrow. Cambridge, U.S., MIT Press, 2008, 443 p.