Cite this article as:

Zhichkin K. A., Petrosjan A. . Economic Aspects of Damage Determination from Agricultural Lands Non-targeted Use. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 90-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-1-90-96


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 

Economic Aspects of Damage Determination from Agricultural Lands Non-targeted Use

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of agricultural land non-targeted use and the damage determination. The purpose of research – to improve the calculating methods of the damage value caused by agricultural land inappropriate use. Objectives: to determine the size non-targeted use in the years 2009–2013 under the Samara region; to analyze the dependence of the damage size caused by territorial location; formulate a particular calculating method at the levels of «enterprise» and «municipal district-region».

Empirical analysis. The study found that non-target use sizes are constantly increasing. Placing objects on the territory of the region does not depend on the profitability of agricultural land, as agricultural production is less competitive compared to the extractive industries. In determining the loss size must be taken into account features of their formation over time, which depends on the type of damage source.

Results. In the reporting period, the damage amount is constantly growing, which is associated with the mining companies expansion. If in 2009 was built 50 wells for various purposes, in 2013 – 236. Direct dependency on the damage size caused by the territory placement have not been identified.

References: 

1. Zhichkin K. A., Penkin A. A., Gur’janov A. V., Zhichkina L. N. Informatsionnoe obespechenie kadastrovoi otsenki zemel’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya (na materialakh Samarskoi oblasti) Information support of cadastral valuation of agricultural land (on materials of the Samara region)]. Kinel, 2015. 159 p.
2. Samarskaya oblast’ (Samara region). Wikipedia. Site. Available at: http: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ /Samarskaya_oblast (accessed 10 May 2015).
3. Zhichkin K. A., Gur’janov A. V., Zhichkina L. N. Kadastrovaia otsenka zemel’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya: sravnitel’nyi analiz metodik dlya uslovii Samarskoi oblasti [Cadastral valuation of agricultural land: a comparative analysis of methods for the conditions of the Samara region]. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Upravlenie zemel’no-imushcestvennymi otnosheniyami» [Materials IX Int. sci.-pract. conf. «Management of land and pro perty relations»]. Penza, 2013, pp. 33–37.
4. Nosov V. V. Modelirovanie optimal’noi struktury proizvodstva sel’skokhozyaistvennoi organizatsii v usloviyakh pogodnogo riska [Optimal structure of agricultural organizations modeling in the weather risks conditions]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics], 2010, no.1 (63), pp. 57–64.
5. Sel’skoe hozyaistvo, okhota i okhotnich’e hozyaistvo, lesovodstvo v Samarskoi oblasti: statisticheskii sbornik [Agriculture, hunting, forestry in the Samara region. Statistical collection]. Samara, 2014. 221 p.
6. Neftyaniki [Oilers. Site]. Available at: http://www.neftyaniki.ru/oilfi elds/russian_oilfi elds/ /samarskaya_oblast/12 (accessed 22 May 2015).
7. Zudilin S. N., Zhichkin K. A. Otsenka snizheniya kachestvennykh parametrov zemel’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya pri netselevom ispol’zovanii [Evaluation reducing quality parameters of agricultural land in the misuse]. Vestnik Ul’ianovskoi gosudarstvennoi sel’skokhozyaistvennoi akademii [Vestnik of Ulyanovsk State Agricultural Academy], 2013, no. 4 (24), pp. 13–17.
8. Zudilin S. N., Zhichkin K. A. Raschet uscherba pri nesel’skokhozyaistvennom ispol’zovanii zemel’ [Calculation of damage in the non-agricultural land use]. Trudy IX Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Upravlenie zemel’no-imuschestvennymi otnosheniyami » [Materials IX Int. sci.-prakt. сonf. «Management of land and property relations»]. Penza, 2013, pp. 38–43.
9. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po raschetu stoimosti kompensatsii ubytkov sel’skokhozyaistvennogo proizvodstva i upuschennoi vygody dlya sobstvennikov zemel’nykh uchastkov, zemlepol’zovatelei i arendatorov pri vremennom zanyatii zemel’nykh uchastkov dlya nesel’skokhozyaistvennykh nuzhd na zemlyakh sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya Samarskoi oblasti [Guidelines for the calculation of the cost of compensation for losses of agricultural production and lost profi ts for land owners, land users and tenants with temporary occupation of land for non-agricultural purposes on agricultural lands of Samara Region]. Samara, 2013. 22 p.
10. Nosov V. V. Kontseptsiia i soderzhanie ustoichivosti sel’skokhoziaistvennogo proizvodstva [The concept and content of the sustainability of agricultural production]. Uchenye zapiski RGSU [Scientifi c notes of Russian State Social University], 2005, no 3 (47), pp. 105–113.
11. Zhichkin K. A., Petrosjan A. L. Netselevoe ispol’zovanie zemel’ sel’skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniya kak istochnik uscherba v sisteme «munitsipal’nyi raion – region » [Non-targeted use of agricultural land as a damage source in the «Municipal district – region» system]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2015, vol. 15. iss. 3, pp. 277–284.
12. Tuytel D., Dyke P. Encouraging Pollution: The Perils of Liability Limits. Available at: http://probeinternational.org/library/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/limited... (accessed 12 April 2015).

Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
опубликована
Short Text (PDF):