Cite this article as:

Anokhina A. A. Constitutional Legal Analysis of the Correlation and Interaction between the Terms and Concepts of «Sovereignty», «Independence» and «State Integrity». Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 330-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2015-15-3-330-334


Heading: 

Constitutional Legal Analysis of the Correlation and Interaction between the Terms and Concepts of «Sovereignty», «Independence» and «State Integrity»

Sovereignty, independence and state integrity are
crucial to the functioning of any state because they are directly linked
to the maintenance of state security. However, it can be acknowledged
that at the present time, despite the heightened interest in the abovementioned
categories, the science of law and the Russian legal system
lack a uniform and consistent approach to the interpretation of the terms
«sovereignty», «independence» and «state integrity». Considering the
importance of these conditions for the stable existence and sustainable
growth of the state, it is necessary to address the question what the
abovementioned categories are and how do they correlate and interact
with each other and analyze these aspects in this paper. Methods.
Basic theoretical methods and special methods were used to achieve
the goals of this research paper. The methods include but are not
limited to: analysis, synthesis, logical methods, dialectical methods,
and systematic-structural methods. The use of the abovementioned
methods was instrumental to the thorough research of the interdependent
objects in interaction and the identification of separate elements
of the researched categories, which, in turn, gave me the opportunity
to draw the proper generalizations and conclusions. Results. In the
course of the research, the author has come to the conclusion that the
terms «sovereignty», «independence» and «state integrity» differ from
each other. And yet these categories are inextricably linked and have
certain elements in common. These categories influence each other,
mutually changing each other. The loss of one category threatens the
future existence and functioning of the other categories

References: 

1. Valjarovskij F. I. Suverenitet v konstitucionnom stroe
Rossijskoj Federacii [Sovereignty in constitutional order
of Russian Federation. Cand. jur. sci. diss.]. Moscow,
2003. 153 p.
2. Sociologicheskaja jenciklopedija: v 2 t. T. 2. Glavnyj redaktor
V. N. Ivanov [Sociological encyclopedia. In 2 vol.
Vol. 2 Ed. V. N. Ivanov]. Moscow, Thought, 2003. 861 p.
3. Avak’jan S. A. Konstitucionnyj leksikon: Gosudarstvenno-
pravovoj terminologicheskij slovar’ [Constitutional
lexicon: state legal terminological glossary].
Moscow, Usticinform, 2015. 640 p.

4. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii (prinjata vsenarodnym
golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok,
vnesennyh Zakonami RF o popravkah k Konstitucii RF
ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot
05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) (Constitution
of Russian Federation of 12 December 1993).
ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].
5. Shevcov V. S. Nacional’nyj suverenitet (problemy teorii i
metodologii) [National sovereignty problems of theory and
methodology]. Moscow, Legal literature, 1978. 320 p.
6. Baglaj M. V. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii:
uchebnik dlja vuzov. 6-e izd., izm. i dop. [Constitutional
law of Russian Federation. Tutorial. 6th ed.]. Moscow,
Norma, 2007. 784 p.
7. Barcic I. N. Pravovoe prostranstvo Rossii. Voprosy
konstitucionnoj teorii i praktiki. [Law area of Russia.
Questions of constitutional theory and practice]. Moscow,
Moscow Univ. Press, 2000. 496 p.
8. Uhankin V. V. Konstitucionno-pravovoj mehanizm
obespechenija gosudarstvennoj celostnosti Rossijskoj
Federacii [Constitutional and legal mechanism to ensure
the integrity of the Russian Federation. Cand. jur. sci.
thesis diss.]. Moscow, 2009. 250 p.
9. Dejstvujushhee mezhdunarodnoe pravo: v 2 t. T. 1.
Deklaracija o principah mezhdunarodnogo prava,
kasajushhihsja druzhestvennyh otnoshenij i sotrudnichestva
mezhdu gosudarstvami v sootvetstvii s Ustavom
Organizacii Ob"edinennyh Nacij, 24 oktjabrja 1970 g.[Valid international law. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. The Declaration
on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance
with the Charter of the United Nations, October 24,
1970]. Moscow, Yurait, 2002. 768 p.
10. Vihrov A. A., Tret’jakov I. L. Suverenitet sovremennoj
Rossijskoj Federacii: sushhnost’ i problemy ukreplenija
[The sovereignty of the modern Russian Federation: the
nature and problems of strengthening]. St. Petersburg,
Polytech. Univ. Press, 2005. 213 p.
11. Konstitucionnoe pravo. Jenciklopedicheskij slovar’
[Constitutional law: Encyclopedic Dictionary. Ed. by
V. I. Chervonjuk]. Moscow, Legal literature, 2002. 432 p.
12. Ustav Organizacii Ob’edinennyh Nacij (Prinjat v g.
San-Francisko 26.06.1945) [UN Charter (adopted in
San Francisco 26.06.1945]. Sbornik dejstvujushhih dogovorov,
soglashenij i konvencij, zakljuchennyh SSSR
s inostrannymi gosudarstvami [Collection of existing
treaties, agreements and conventions concluded by the
USSR with foreign states]. Iss. XII. M., Gospolitizdat,
1956, pp. 14–47.
13. О Strategii nacional’noj bezopasnosti Rossijskoj Federacii
do 2020 goda: Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 12 maja 2009 g.
№ 537 (red. ot 01.07.2014) [National Security Strategy
of the Russian Federation until 2020. Presidential Decree
of 12.05.2009 № 537]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF
[Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2009,
no. 20, art. 2444; 2014, no. 27, art. 3754.
© Бабаева

Status: 
опубликована
Short Text (PDF):