Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Zarubina M. N. About Law Tricks of Restriction to Appeal to the Court with Compensatory Claims for Violation of the Right to Trial or Execution of a Judgment in a Reasonable Time. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 349-356. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-2-1-349-356

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon 349-356.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Law
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
347.922.3
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-2-1-349-356

About Law Tricks of Restriction to Appeal to the Court with Compensatory Claims for Violation of the Right to Trial or Execution of a Judgment in a Reasonable Time

Autors: 
Zarubina Mariya Nikolaevna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The main guarantees of access to justice is provided by various procedural and organizational rules of law. In the context of globalization and integration of legal mechanisms of protection the rights and freedoms of man and citizen more attention is drawn to the legal structures which identifies prerequisites and conditions for the right to claim in court. To ensure the right of access to court these structures should not interfere with stakeholders to make dispositive procedural steps aimed to freely receive legal protection. Meanwhile, in Chapter 22.1 of the Civil Process Code RF regulating production for compensation for breach of the right to trial within a reasonable time, or right in the performance of a judicial act within a reasonable time, there are legal restrictions on the right of access to court with this kind of claims, which negatively affects the image of the judiciary, since this production is aimed at restoring public rights to a fair trial, impaired the administration of justice, particularly in civil cases. Methods. Methodological basis of the research is an internal interconnected complex of knowledge methods: system-structured, functional, logical. The basic method is materialistic dialectics, which allowed the author to explore the legal restrictions of the right to go to court with compensatory claims in the relationship and interdependence with other conditions of the recovery mechanism of the right to a fair trial at the national level. Results. The author comes to the conclusion about changes in procedural law to ensure access to the judicial protection of the right to a fair trial on three fronts: 1) expanding the boundaries of the jurisdiction of civil cases for compensatory claims, 2) simplification of the procedure for filing a compensatory action in a competent court, 3) introduction of additional guarantees the right to a fair trial in the consideration and resolution of the civil cases. 

Key words: 
civil proceedings
right to a fair trial
compensatory claim
judicial protection
appeal to the court
Reference: 
  1. Konstitucija Rossijskoj Federacii (prinjata 12 dekabrja 1993 g.) [The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by national referendum 12 December 1993)]. Rossiiskaja gazeta [Russian newspaper], 1993, 25 Dec.
  2. O ratifikatsii Konventsii o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i Protokolov k nej: federal’nyj zakon ot 30 marta 1998 g. № 54-FZ [On ratification of the Convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms and its Protocols Federal law of March 30, 1998 № 54-FZ]. Byulleten’ mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov [Bulletin of international treaties], 1998, no. 6, p. 104.
  3. Grazhdanskij kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii (chast’ vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 g. № 14-FZ (red. ot 28.12.2013) [Civil code of the Russian Federation (part two) from 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ (as amended on 28.12.2013)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1996, no. 5, art. 410.
  4. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25.01.2001 № 1-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya punkta 2 stat’i 1070 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan I. V. Bogdanova, А. B. Zernova, S. I. Kal’yanova i N. V. Trukhanova» [The decision of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated 25.01.2001 № 1-P «On the case about the verification of constitutionality of provisions of paragraph 2 of article 1070 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaints of citizens I. V. Bogdanov, A. B. Zernov, S. I. kalyanova and N. V. Trukhanov»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2001, no. 7, art. 700.
  5. Grazhdanskij protsessual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (red. ot 23.06.2014) [Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation from 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (as amended on 23.06.2014)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 46, art. 4532.
  6. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Ilyushkin i drugie protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Ilyushkin vs. Russia» 17 April 2012). Available at: http://europeancourt.ru/tag/ilyushkin-i-drugie-protiv-rossii (accessed 23 June 2013).
  7. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Kalinkin i drugie protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Kalinkin and etc. vs. Russia» 17 April 2012). Available at: http://genproc.gov.ru/documents/espch/document-79867/ (accessed 23 June 2013).
  8. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Emel’yanovy i drugie protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Emel’yanovy and etc. vs. Russia»14 March 2013). Available at: http://roseurosud.org/87-po-delu-emelyanovy-i-drugie-protiv-rossii.html (accessed 15 December 2014).
  9. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Chernichkin protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Chernichkin vs. Russia» 16 September 2010). Available at: http://europeancourt.ru/2010/09/16/3756 (accessed 23 June 2013).
  10. Proekt № 246960-6 Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federatsii (red., prinyataya GD FS RF v I chtenii 21.05.2013) (Project № 246960-6 of the Code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation (as amended, adopted by the state Duma in the first reading 21.05.2013)) Available at: http://www.duma.gov.ru/systems/law/?number=246960-6&sort=date (accessed 17 May 2014).
  11. Nikitina A.V. Razumnyj srok sudebnogo razbiratel’stva i ispolnenija sudebnyh aktov: praktika poluchenija spravedlivoj kompensacii [Reasonable time of the trial and execution of judicial acts: the practice of obtaining fair compensation. Ed. S. V. Narutto]. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2012. 160 p.
  12. Аrbitrazhnyj protsessual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 02.11.2013) [The arbitration procedural code of the Russian Federation dated 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ] (as amended on 02.11.2013). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2002, no. 30, art. 3012.
  13. O statuse sudej v Rossijskoj Federatsii: zakon RF ot 26.06.1992 № 3132-1 (red. ot 25.11.2013) [On the status of judges in the Russian Federation: the Federal Law from 26.06.1992 № 3132-1 (as amended on 25.11.2013)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1995, no. 26, art. 2399.
  14. Kodeks sudejskoj ehtiki: utv. VIII Vserossijskim s”ezdom sudej 19.12.2012 [The code of judicial ethics: appr. VIII all-Russian Congress of judges 19.12.2012]. Byulleten’ aktov po sudebnoj sisteme [Bulletin of acts on the judicial system], 2013, no. 2, pp. 23–31.
  15. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Kudeshkina protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Kudeshkina vs. Russia» 26 February 2009). Available at: http://www.lawmix.ru/vas/69711 (accessed 14 June 2013).
  16. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Moiseev protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Moiseev vs. Russia» 9 October 2010). Available at: URL:http://www.lawmix.ru/vas/83502 (accessed 23 June 2013).
  17. Postanovlenije Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Golder protiv Soedinennogo Korolevstva» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Golder vs. the United Kingdom» 21 February 1975). Available at: http://europeancourt.ru/resheniya-evropejskogosuda-na-russkom-yazyke/golder-protiv-soedinennogokorolevstva-postanovlenievropejskogo-suda (accessed 11 August 2013).
  18. Zimnenko B. L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i pravovaja sistema Rossijskoj Federacii. Osobennaja chast’. Kurs lekcij (International law and the legal system of the Russian Federation. Special part. Lectures) (Moscow, 2010). Available at: http://www.garant.ru (accessed 15 March 2013).
  19. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Groshev protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Groshev vs. Russia» 20 October 2005). Available at: http://www.espch.ru (accessed 21 January 2010).
  20. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Mokrushina protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Mokrushina vs. Russia» 5 October 2006). Available at: http://www.lawmix.ru/vas/121329 (accessed 21 January 2010).
  21. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Prokopenko protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Prokopenko vs. Russia» 3 May 2007). Available at: http://www.espch.ru (accessed 21 January 2010).
  22. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Zagorodnikov protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Zagorodnikov vs. Russia» 7 June 2007). Available at: http://www.espch.ru (accessed 21 January 2010).
  23. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Kuznetsov i drugie protiv RF» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Kuznetsov and etc. vs. Russia» 11 January 2007). Available at: http://mmdc.ru/praktika_evropejskogo_suda/praktika_po_st10_evropejskoj_konvencii/europ_practice17/ (accessed 21 January 2010).
  24. Postanovlenie Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka «Tatishvili protiv Rossii» (Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights «Tatishvili vs. Russia» 22 February 2007). Available at: http://www.espch.ru (accessed 21 January 2010)
  25. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 19.07.2011 № 17-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya punkta 5 chasti pervoj stat’i 244.6 Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboj grazhdanina S.Yu. Kakueva» [The decision of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 19.07.2011 No.17-P «On the case about the verification of constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 5 of part one of article 244.6 Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen S. Yu. Kakueva»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2011, no. 30(2) art. 4699.
  26. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 30.11.2012 № 29-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenij chasti pyatoj stat’i 244.6 i chasti vtoroj stat’i 333 Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan А. G. Kruglova, А. V. Margina, V. А. Martynova i Yu. S. Shardyko» [The decision of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 30.11.2012 № 29-P «On the case about the verification of constitutionality of part fi ve article 244.6 and part two of article 333 of the Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaints of citizens A. G. Kruglova, A. V. Marginalized, V. A. Martynov and the Yu. S. Shardyko»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2012, no. 51, art. 7323.
  27. O vnesenii izmenenij v Grazhdanskij protsessual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii: Federal’nyj zakon ot 28.12.2013 № 436-FZ [On amendments to the Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation: the Federal law from 28.12.2013 № 436-FZ]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2013, no. 52 (pt. I), art. 7001.
Received: 
23.04.2014
Accepted: 
12.05.2014