Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Potapenko E. G. Results of Abstract Interpretation of the Volume of Norms of Civil Procedural Law. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 324-329. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-3-324-329

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon e._g._potapenko_324-329.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Law
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
347.93
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2019-19-3-324-329

Results of Abstract Interpretation of the Volume of Norms of Civil Procedural Law

Autors: 
Potapenko Evgeny Georgievich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Introduction. The interpretation of legal norms is one of the main issues of legal science and practice which are quite debatable. The problem of interpreting norms in terms of their volume is very significant and is widely discussed in modern jurisprudence. The interpretation of the volume of norms acquires particular importance when it concerns civil procedural law as a system of norms that establish the procedure of hearing and solution of civil cases, administrative cases and some other ones. Theoretical analysis. An abstract interpretation of procedural norms is a relatively independent legal activity that is not absorbed by law-making and law enforcement. The results of such interpretation should not be included in the interpreted procedural norm. The legal provisions formed as a result of the procedural norms interpretation can differ from the content of the interpreted norm (restrictive and extensive interpretation). Empirical analysis. The practice of abstract interpretation of procedural norms by senior courts allows to identify complementary and excluding legal provisions which in terms of their volume and content differ from the interpreted procedural norm. Exclusive provisions are less common due to the prevailing imperative nature of civil procedure law. Results. The extensive and restrictive interpretation of the norms of civil procedural law leads to the formation of special complementary and excluding legal provisions that express the real meaning of the procedural norm with the generalization of practice of its implementation (including certain types of cases and certain legal situations).

Key words: 
civil process
arbitral procedure
interpretation of the procedural norms
procedural form
Reference: 
  1. Golubeva L. A. The interpretation of law in lawmaking process. Zhurnal pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy [Journal of legal and economic research], 2013, no. 2, pp. 44–47 (in Russian).
  2. Cherdantsev A. F. Tolkovanie prava i dogovora [Interpretation of law and contract]. Moscow, Unity-Dana Publ., 2003. 381 p. (in Russian).
  3. Vershinina S. I. To a Question on interpretation of Norms of the Right as an Independent Kind of Legal Activity. Vektor nauki TGU. Ser. Yuridicheskie nauki [Science vector of TSU. Ser. Jurisprudence], 2010, no. 2 (2), pp. 36–39 (in Russian).
  4. Bonner A. T. Primenenie normativnykh aktov v grazhdanskom protsesse [Application of regulatory acts in civil process]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaia literature Publ., 1980. 160 p. (in Russian).
  5. Pigolkin A. S. Tolkovanie normativnykh aktov v SSSR [Interpretation of regulatory acts in the USSR]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1962. 166 p. (in Russian).
  6. Voplenko N. N. Ofi tsial’noe tolkovanie norm prava [The offi cial interpretation of the law norms]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaia literature Publ., 1976. 118 p. (in Russian).
  7. Cherdantsev A. F. Osnovnye problemy teorii tolkovaniya sovetskogo prava [The main problems of the interpretation theory of Soviet law]. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Jur.). Sverdlovsk, 1972. 35 p. (in Russian).
  8. On the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Federal constitutional law of 05.02.2014 no. 3-FKZ (an edition of 10.30.2018). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 6, art. 550; 2018, no. 45, art. 6823 (in Russian).
  9. On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Federal constitutional law of 21.07.1994 no. 1-FKZ (an edition of 29.07.2018). Sobranie  zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of laws of the Russian Federation], 1994, no. 13, art. 1447; 2018, no. 31, art. 4811 (in Russian).
  10. Lazarev V. V. Law Statements: Concept, Origin and Its Role in the Mechanism of Legal Infl uence. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence], 1976, no. 6, pp. 7–15 (in Russian).
  11. Gurvich M. A. Sudebnoe reshenie. Teoreticheskie problemy [Judgment. Theoretical problems]. Moscow, Yuridicheskaia literature Publ., 1976. 176 p. (in Russian).
  12. On court application of legislation in the consideration of cases regarding establishment of parentage. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 16.05.2017, no. 16. Biulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the RF], 2017, no. 7 (in Russian).
  13. On court application of legislation in the consideration of cases regarding recovery of alimony. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 26.12.2017, no. 56. Biulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the RF], 2018, no. 4 (in Russian).
  14. On some issues related to the introduction of the Code of Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of 09.12.2002, no. 11. Vestnik VAS RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the RF], 2003, no. 2 (in Russian).
  15. On certain issues regarding a court application of Administrative Court Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 27.09.2016, no. 36. Biulleten’ Vekrhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the RF], 2016, no. 11 (in Russian).
  16. On certain issues of application of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in wording of the Federal Law of July 27, 2010, no. 228-FZ “On Amendments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of 17.02.2011, no. 12. Vestnik VAS RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the RF], 2011, no. 4 (in Russian).
  17. On consideration by commercial courts of economic disputes involving cross-border relations. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 27.06.2017, no. 23. Biulleten’ Vekrhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the RF], 2017, no. 8 (in Russian).
  18. On the practice of court proceedings on challenging regulatory acts in whole or in part. Resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 29.11.2007, no. 48. Biulleten’ Vekrhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the RF], 2008, no. 1 (in Russian).
Received: 
10.06.2019
Accepted: 
25.07.2019