For citation:
Sosnovikova A. M. The position of digital skills and habits in the criminalistic system. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2026, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 70-78. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2026-26-1-70-78, EDN: QAYHWW
The position of digital skills and habits in the criminalistic system
Introduction. In the context of the rapid growth in the number of computer crimes committed annually, the issues of developing recommendations for their detection and investigation, as well as the study of specific trace information are of particular importance. Digital skills and habits deserve special attention. Before developing recommendations for working with them, it is necessary to determine their position in the system of criminalistics. This article is devoted to achieving this goal. Theoretical analysis. The opinions of various scientists on the issue of positioning the doctrine of skills and habits in the system of forensic science were considered. The author highlighted suggestions for its description as an individual forensic theory within the general theory of forensic science; consideration within the framework of the doctrine of man; allocation at the level of general theory and isolation as an independent branch of forensic technology. Empirical analysis. It is established that skills and habits are integral and universal in nature, inseparable from man, therefore, they should be studied within the framework of the doctrine of man. However, the latter has not yet acquired a consensus status in science, so considering skills and habits within its framework is a question of the prospects for the development of forensic science, while now it is optimal to limit ourselves to the branch of forensic technology. It is necessary to take into account that for digital skills and habits this is true only when considering their general provisions, the specificity of various skill properties is harmoniously part of digital forensics, which does not cause discussions. Results. Today, knowledge of digital skills and habits, rules for identifying information about them, recording, removing, storing and processing this information should be recognized as system-forming for subjects of forensic activity and should be assimilated in the process of professional education. They should be studied within the framework of the forensic technology section until the doctrine of man, which will include the doctrine of skills and habits (including digital ones), is finally formed.
- Kryukova E. S. Patterns of objective reality studied by forensic science and features of using information about them in crime investigation. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2020. 250 p. (in Russian).
- Chulakhov V. N. Forensic science doctrine of human skills and habits. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2005. 371 p. (in Russian).
- Samoilov G. A. Osnovy kriminalisticheskogo ucheniya o navykakh [Fundamentals of forensic science teaching on skills]. Moscow, 1968. 120 p. (in Russian).
- Tsvetkova A. D. Digital habits and skills: A system of signs and their forensic significance. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2024, no. S9 (121), pp. 83–90 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2024.121.9s.083-090, EDN: INRERM
- Gross H. Handbuch Fur Untersuchungsrichter ALS System Der Kriminalistik. Teil 2. Hardcover, De Gruyter, 1914. 578 p. (Russ. ed.: Moscow, LeksEst, 2002. 1088 p.).
- Tanriverdi H. Was der Code russischer Elite-Hacker verrät. Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2017, 15 February. Available at: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaft/it-sicherheit-was-der-code-russis... (accessed July 1, 2025).
- Khmyz A. I. Getting detection information as a part of the study of electronic documents and their material mappings. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study Art. Issues of the Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 12–4 (62), pp. 184–189 (in Russian). EDN: UZENED
- Galyashina E. I. The semiotics of emoticons and animated pictures in the aspect of forensic linguistic expertise. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2022, no. 2 (90), pp. 41–48 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2022.90.2.041-048, EDN: PCFFYR
- Belkin R. S. Course of criminalistics. Moscow, Yuniti, 2001. Vol. 2. 314 p. (in Russian).
- Svetlichny A. A. Relationship of the concepts “particular criminalistic theory” and “criminalistic doctrine”: Terminological aspects. Izvestiya Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2023, no. 2, pp. 120–128 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6184-2023-2-120-128
- Foygel E. I. Modern structural and methodological approach to the criminalistic doctrine about person. Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow), 2016, vol. 3, no. 3 (8), pp. 212–218 (in Russian). EDN: ZDMENR
- Isutin-Fedotkov D. V. Osnovy kriminalisticheskogo izucheniya lichnosti [Fundamentals of forensic study of personality]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2018. 288 p. (in Russian).
- Foygel E. I. Basic provisions of the forensic doctrine on man and human activity. Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Academic Law Journal], 2016, no. 2 (64), pp. 49–53 (in Russian). EDN: WHQJWX
- Dyablova Yu. L. Personality structure in forensic science. Deiatel’nost’ pravookhranitel’nykh organov v sovremennykh usloviiakh [Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies in Modern Conditions: Proceedings of the XXI International scientific and practical conference (Irkutsk, May 26–27, 2016)]. Irkutsk, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 340–345 (in Russian).
- Malykhina N. I. System of the criminological study on the actors of a crime. Criminal Procedure, Criminalistics and Judicial Examination Problems, 2015, no. 2 (6), pp. 22–26 (in Russian). EDN: WMDUOX
- Povreznyuk G. I. Theory and practice of forensic identification. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2005. 433 p. (in Russian).
- Chulakhov V. N. On the system of forensic technology as a section of forensic science. The Union of Criminalists and Criminologists, 2020, no. 2, pp. 31–37 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31085/2310-8681-2020-2-208-31-37, EDN: VHBMYM
- Morozova A. L. Forensic Study of Human Sweat and Fat Traces of Hands in Order to Establish Their Age. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2000. 120 p. (in Russian).
- Kriminalistika. Chast’ 3 [Drapkin L. Ya. (ed.) Forensic Science. Pt. 3. 2nd ed., rev. and enl.]. Moscow, Yurait, 2020. 392 p. (in Russian).
- Ponomarev V. V. Methodological and organizational foundations of the study of papillary patterns with their fragmentary display in traces. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Moscow, 2009. 28 c. (in Russian).
- Malykhina N. I. Forensic doctrines and theories: Problems of formation and determination of place in the system of forensic science. Pravovaia politika i pravovaia zhizn’ [Legal Policy and Legal Life], 2021, no. 2, pp. 193–199 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/1608-8794-2021-2-193-199, EDN: TQHEMZ
- Mozhaeva I. P. Trends in the development of criminalistics. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel’stve [Gaps in Russian Legislation], 2012, no. 2, pp. 217–220 (in Russian). EDN: OXDSPV
- Golovin A. Yu. Historical and legal aspects of the development of the forensic science system. JuristPravoved, 2002, no. 2 (5), pp. 76–78 (in Russian). EDN: XROQWD
- Terziev N. V. On the issue of the system of Soviet forensic science. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence], 1961, no. 2, pp. 152–156 (in Russian).
- Golovin A. Yu. The system of forensic science: Theoretical issues. Aktual’nye problemy kriminalistiki i sudebnoy ekspertizy [Actual Problems of Forensic Science and Forensic Examination: Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference (Irkutsk, March 15–16, 2019)]. Irkutsk, 2019, pp. 32–37 (in Russian). EDN: IFQWUT