Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)

For citation:

Presnyakov M. V. Legal Definiteness: Formal and Material Aspects. Journal Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 669-674. DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-4-669-674

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
PDF icon 669-674.pdf
(downloads: 0)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Law
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
34.023
DOI: 
10.18500/1994-2540-2014-14-4-669-674

Legal Definiteness: Formal and Material Aspects

Autors: 
Presnyakov Mikhail V., Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Administration of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract: 

Introduction. One of the major constitutional requirements to the legal law is the requirement of its legal definiteness. However this re- quirement isn’t limited to definiteness of a legal form, but assumes the accounting of material or actual aspect of definiteness of the right. Theoretical analysis. In article legal definiteness through a dichotomy of its formal and material aspects is considered. The author comes to a conclusion that characteristic approach for domestic law to the right as to a form isn’t gnoseological indisputable. Results. Proceeding from the carried-out analysis the author allocates various aspects of formal and actual definiteness in the right, and also proves need of expansion of tool base of science of the theory of the right and a constitutional law. In particular, as one of perspective gnoseological paradigms sociocultural approach to the right is.

Key words: 
legal definiteness
formal definiteness
definiteness of legal status
sociocultural approach.
Reference: 
  1. Masaladzhiu R. Princip pravovoj opredelennosti v nauke, praktike ESPCh i ego vlijanie na dostupnost’ pravosudija na stadii nadzornogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe [Printsip of legal definiteness in science, practice of ECHR and its influence on availability of justice on stages of supervising production in civil and arbitration process]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process [Arbitration and civil process], 2009, no 7, pp. 22–25; no. 8, pp. 10–13.
  2. Sultanov A. R. Pravovaja opredelennost’ v nadzornom proizvodstve GPK RF i praktika Konstitucionnogo Suda RF [Legal definiteness in supervising production of GPK Russian Federation and the practician of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Pravo i politika [Right and policy], 2007, no. 5, pp. 30–39.
  3. Romanec Yu. Pravovaja opredelennost’ ili beznakazannost’? [Legal definiteness or impunity?]. EZh-Yurist, 2011, no. 49.
  4. Pokrovsky I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Main problems of civil law]. Moscow, 1998. 353 p.
  5. Zhuravleva O. O. Princip pravovoj opredelennosti i akty vysshih sudebnyh organov v nalogovom prave [Printsip of legal definiteness and acts of the supreme judicial authorities in the tax right]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Magazine of Russian law], 2011, no. 4, pp. 73–77.
  6. Shershenevich G. F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Textbook of the Russian civil law]. 10th ed. Moscow, 1911. 556 p.
  7. Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie. T. 1. Proekt Vysochajshe uchrezhdennoj Redakcionnoj komissii po sostavleniju Grazhdanskogo ulozhenija. Pod red. I. M. Tjutrjumova. [Civil code. T. 1. The project most high the founded Editorial commission on drawing up the Civil code. Ed. by I. M. Tjutrjumov]. St. Petersburg, 1910. 1215 p.
  8. Cherepakhin B. B. Priobretenie prava sobstvennosti po davnosti vladenija [Buying of property on prescription of possession]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo [Soviet state and the right], 1940, no. 4, pp. 51–61.
  9. Nersesjanc V. S. Obshhaja teorija gosudarstva i prava [General theory of the state and right]. Moscow, 1999. 552 p.
  10. Nersesyants V. S. Filosofija prava [Legal philosophy]. Moscow, 2005. 590 p.
  11. Kruss V. I. O probleme zanizhennoj samoocenki, obekte i predmete nauki konstitucionnogo prava [About a problem of the underestimated self-assessment, object and an object of science of a constitutional right]. Konstitucionnoe i municipalnoe pravo [Constitutional and municipal right], 2007, no. 15, pp. 2–4.
  12. Alekseev S. S. Pravo: azbuka – teorija – filosofija: opyt kompleksnogo issledovanija [Right: the alphabet – the theory – philosophy: experience of complex research]. Moscow, 1999. 712 p.
  13. Bajteeva M. V. Jazyk i pravo [Language and right]. Kazan, 2013. 253 p.
  14. Chestnov I. L. Pravo kak dialog: k formirovaniju novoj ontologii pravovoj real’nosti [Right as dialogue: to formation of new ontology of legal reality]. St. Petersburg, 2000. 104 p.
  15. Polyakov A. V. Kommunikativnaja koncepcija prava (genezis i teoretiko-pravovoe obosnovanie) [Communicative concept of the right (genesis and teoretiko-legal justification). Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 478 p.
Received: 
25.09.2014
Accepted: 
22.09.2014