Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Economics. Management. Law

ISSN 1994-2540 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1956 (Online)


Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
331.5
EDN: 
FTZQZO

Institutional portfolio of Russian education

Autors: 
Manokhina Nadezhda Vasilievna, Saratov State University
Mityaeva Nataliya Vyacheslavovna, Saratov State University
Ustinova Natalia Grigorievna, Saratov Social-Economic Institute of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Abstract: 

Introduction. The educational system is constitutive in all countries, it is one of the world’s largest systems that generates and reproduces human, intellectual, cognitive capital. National educational systems have both common features and differences, which are based on unique components – institutional genes. Russian education inherits many of the best traditions of the previous social system, thanks to which world recognized successes have been achieved. Most of these traditions have acquired the qualities of institutional genes, but this does not exclude the emergence of stable inefficient institutions, i.e. institutional traps. These are the characteristics of Russian education that are synthesized in its institutional portfolio as a topical and, in many ways, new research topic. Theoretical analysis. This study for the first time offers an approach to Russian education from the standpoint of institutional genetics. Institutional genes are a set of institutions, institutional structures, their interactions, mutual determinations, various rules of the game that are inherited, i.e. are transmitted from the previous economic system to the next, develop within the existing system, are constantly reproduced. Institutional genes can undergo processes of various changes - mutations and mimicry, dysfunctions, institutional pathologies. Empirical analysis. The main characteristics of institutional genes are highlighted: they are inherited, changed, reproduced within the framework of subsequent economic systems, which creates a certain predictability of trends in future socio-economic development and the possibility of choosing effective directions in politics. The study of new institutional traps in Russian education is of scientific interest, which is significant for determining the mechanisms of their leveling in the general course of systemic transformations. Results. An institutional portfolio of Russian education is presented, containing an analysis of the best traditions of the domestic education system, most of which is identified as institutional genes, and its new institutional traps. The significance of the appeal to the institutional genetics of Russian education and the existence of institutional traps, mechanisms for leveling them to substantiate the algorithm for the development of the educational system in accordance with its genesis, national priorities and strategic prospects is substantiated.

Reference: 
  1.  “Velikiy triumf Sovetskogo Soiuza”. Vyskazyvaniya inostrannykh politikov o polete Gagarina (The Great Triumph of the Soviet Union. Statements of Foreign Politicians about Gagarin’s Flight). Available at: https://tass.ru/info/11116465?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com (accessed 16 May 2022) (in Russian).
  2. Gosudarstva v obrazovanii stanovitsia vse bol’she (The government’s involvement in education is becoming higher). Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/ doc/5192784 (accessed 1 February 2022) (in Russian).
  3. Bondarenko N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Zorina O. A. et al. Indikatory obrazovaniya: 2022 [Indicators of Education: 2022. Statistical Collection]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2022. 532 p. (in Russian).
  4. Tenisheva K. How extracurricular activities affect the success of schoolchildren. Materials of the XX April International Scientifi c Conference on the Problems of Economic and Social Development. Higher School of Economics. April 9–12. Moscow, 2019. Available at: https://conf.hse.ru/2019/search/search.html?text=%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0&simple=1&searchid=2284688 (accessed 29 April 2022) (in Russian).
  5. Pliusy i minusy sovetskogo obrazovaniya (Pros and cons of Soviet education). Available at: https://ruxpert.ru/%D0%9F%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B8_%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%83%D1%81%D1%8B_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F (accessed 12 June 2022) (in Russian).
  6. Vuzy iz proekta «5-100» tak i ne voshli v top-100 mezhdunarodnykh reitingov (Universities from Project “5-100” are not in International Top Universities Rankings). Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/society/18/02/2021/602cbdff9a7947765cbb58e5 (accessed 31 May 2022) (in Russian).
  7. Degradatsiya obrazovaniya – eto bol’she, chem oshibka, eto prestuplenie (The Degradation of Education is Worse than Mistake, it’s Crime). Available at: https://regnum.ru/news/polit/3299448.html (accessed 2 May 2022) (in Russian).
  8. Alikin A., Ermakov D. Vpered v proshloe: kak rossiiskikh detei uchat po «stalinskim» uchebnikam (Forward to the past: How Russian children are taught according to “Stalinist” textbooks). Available at: https://ria.ru/20210119/obrazovanie-1593462601.htm (accessed 2 May 2022) (in Russian).
  9. Piat’ dovodov Ol’gi Vasil’evoi, pochemu nam nuzhno vernut’sya k sovetskoi shkole (Olga Vasilyeva’s fi ve reasons why we need to return to the Soviet school). Available at: https://mel.fm/vospitaniye/sovety/1642539-arguments_vasilieva (accessed 12 June 2022) (in Russian).
  10. Manokhina N. V. “Institutional traps” and institutional vacuum in the Russian innovation environment. Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2011, no. 5, pp. 44–48 (in Russian).
  11. Kolichestvo rossiyan s vysshim obrazovaniem prevysilo 31% (The number of Russians with higher education exceeded 31%). Available at: https://rg.ru/2021/06/15/kolichestvo-rossiian-s-vysshim-obrazovaniemprevysilo-31-procent.html (accessed 12 May 2022) (in Russian).
  12. The World Bank, UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2022) Global Education Expenditure 2022. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/global-education-expenditure (accessed 12 June 2022) (in Russian).
  13. Rossiya tratit na odnogo uchashhegosia v tri raza men’she Ameriki (Russia’s spendings per student are three times less than in the US). Available at: https://www.ng.ru/economics/2020-09-21/4_7969_education.html (accessed 1 June 2022) (in Russian).
  14. V Saratovskoy oblasti u zhiteley 93 naselennykh punktov net interneta. Available at: https://saratov24.tv/news/v-saratovskoy-oblasti-u-zhiteley-93-naselennykhpunktov-net-interneta/ (accessed 20 March 2022) (in Russian).
  15. Prakhov I., Rudakov V. The determinants of faculty pay in Russian universities: Incentive contracts. European Journal of Higher Education, 2021, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 408–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1870243
  16. Zhenshchiny ushli v shkolu (Women went to school). Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4282579 (accessed 18 April 2022) (in Russian).
  17. Pochemu sredi uchitelei na desiat’ zhenshchin prikhoditsia odin muzhchina (Why is there only one man for every ten female teachers). Available at: https://rg.ru/2019/09/21/reg-urfo/pochemu-srediuchitelej-na-desiat-zhenshchin-prihoditsia-odinmuzhchina.html (accessed 12 June 2022) (in Russian).
  18. Bondarenko N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Zorina O. A. et al. Indikatory obrazovaniya: 2021 [Indicators of education: 2021. Statistical Collection]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2021. 508 p. (in Russian).
  19. Ustinova N. G. Generation and reproduction of institutional innovations. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 48–54 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-1-48-54
  20. Mityaeva N. V. Social effi ciency and dysfunctions of the digital economy in the context of a pandemic. In: S. D. Bodrunov (ed.) Genezis noonomiki: NTP, diffuziya sobstvennosti, sotsializatsiya obshchestva, solidarizm. Sbornik plenarnykh dokladov Ob”edinennogo mezhdunarodnogo kongressa SPEK-PNO-2020 [Genesis of neo-economics: NPP, diffusion of property, socialization of society, solidarism. Collection of plenary reports of the Joint International Congress SPEC-PNO-2020]. Vol. 2. Moscow, INIR Publ., 2021, pp. 572–578 (in Russian).
Received: 
15.06.2022
Accepted: 
01.09.2022