Organization and Legal and Methodological Problems of the All-Embracing Diagnostic Experts’ Examination of Firearms, Cartridges and Their Traces
Introduction. Today’s urge to improve the effectiveness of crime investigation increasingly requires attracting resources such as forms of expert research like ‘complex examination’ . In the theory of criminology and forensic formed certain scientific ideas into the nature of complex expertise , its characteristic features. However, not yet fully removed questions regarding the concepts and features comprehensive expertise, organization and methods of production , including complex diagnostic expert research guns, ammunition and traces of their actions. The purpose and objectives of the study. The aim of the study is to improve the institutional, legal and methodological support complex diagnostic expert research guns, ammunition and traces of their actions. To solve this goal should be to clarify the concept and features of the comprehensive examination, provide justification species complex diagnostic expert research guns, ammunition and traces of their actions reveal the characteristic features of their expert research methodology. Methods and results. The analysis of regulatory sources in the target area and production of the forensic literature and materials of modern practice of expert research guns, ammunition and traces of their actions. The study demonstrated that the symptoms of complex examination are; first – the fact of participation in the production of forensics experts of different specialties, and secondly, the participation of all members of the expert committee to discuss the results and formulate general conclusions. Based on the complex subject of diagnostic examination of weapons, ammunition and traces of action, the author identifies its following varieties: a forensic ballistic and forensic, ballistic and forensic examination of materials, substances and products (physical and chemical). Conclusion. The results obtained provide the conditions for the effective use of scientific knowledge about complex diagnostic expert studies guns, ammunition and traces of their actions in their practice of forensic experts, investigators, investigators and judges in the appointment, manufacturing expertise, evaluation expert conclusions involved in criminal proceedings
- Shikanov V. I. Pravovaja reglamentacija kompleksnoj jekspertizy v svete trebovanij zakonnosti i obosnovannosti jekspertnyh zakljuchenij [Legal regulation of complex examination in light of the requirements of legality and validity of expert opinions]. Tez. dokl. i soobshh. (nauchnaja konferencija, aprel’ 1971) [Tes. of reports. and posts. (Conference, April 1971)]. Omsk, Omsk Higher School of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs police, 1971, pp. 75–77.
- Orlov Yu. K. Processual’nye problemy kompleksnoj jekspertizy [Procedural problems of complex examination]. Aktual’nye voprosy teorii sudebnoj jekspertizy: sb. nauch. tr. [Topical issues in theory forensics: sat scientifi c papers]. Moscow, VNIISJe, 1976, iss. 21, pp. 82–109.
- Berger V. E. Nekotorye voprosy organizacii kompleksnyh kriminalisticheskih i sudebno-medicinskih jekspertiz [Some questions of the organization of complex forensic and forensic examinations]. Vnedrenie nauchnotehnicheskih sredstv i nauchnyh rekomendacij v praktiku rassledovanija i sudebnogo razbiratel’stva ugolovnyh del: tez. dokl. na vsesojuz. konf. [Introduction of scientific and technical equipment and scientific advice in the practice of investigation and trial of criminal cases: tes. of reports. on Proc. conf.]. Moscow, VNIISJe, 1977, pp. 67–68.
- Koruhov Yu. G. Jekspertnye i nejekspertnye trasologicheskie issledovanija v ugolovnom processe [Expert and neekspertnye trasological research in criminal proceedings]. Problemy trasologicheskih issledovanij: sb. nauch. tr. [Problems trasological research: sat scientifi c papers]. Moscow, VNIISJe, 1978, iss. 35, pp. 3–105.
- Berger V. E. Nekotorye voprosy organizacii proizvodstva kompleksnyh jekspertiz v sudebno-jekspertnyh uchrezhdenijah sistemy Ministerstva justicii SSSR [Some issues of organization of production of complex expertise in forensic expert institutions of the Ministry of justice of the USSR]. Kriminalistika i sudebnaja jekspertiza [Criminalistics and judicial examination.]. Iss. 19, Kiev, 1979, pp. 23–28.
- Metodicheskie rekomendacii po organizacii i provedeniju v sudebno-jekspertnyh uchrezhdenijah kompleksnogo issledovanija veshhestvennyh dokazatel’stv. Podg. V. S. Mitrichevym [Guidelines for the organization and holding of forensic institutions a comprehensive study of physical evidence. Ge. V. S. Mitrichev]. Moscow, VNIISJe, 1979. 79 p.
- Arsen’ev V. D. Organizacionno-pravovye problemy kompleksnyh jekspertnyh issledovanij v sudebno-jekspertnyh uchrezhdenijah [Organizational and legal problems of complex expert studies in forensic institutions]. Ispol’zovanie sovremennyh dostizhenij nauki i tehniki v dejatel’nosti sledstvennyh organov i sudov po bor’be s prestupnost’ju: tez. respub. konf. [Use of modern science and technology in the activities of the investigative agencies and courts in the fi ght against crime: tes. republics conf.]. Vil’njus: NIISJe MJu LitSSSR, pp. 53–56.
- Atanesjan G. A., Georgiev L. I. K voprosu o kompleksnyh sudebno-jekspertnyh issledovanijah [On the complex forensic investigations]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [The Moscow University Herald]. Ser. 11. Law, 1981, no. 1, pp. 32–38.
- Ugolovno-processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (s posl. izm. i dop.) [Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation dated 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (with subsequent. Rev. And ext.)]. Collection of Law of the Russian Federation, 2001, no. 52 (pt. I), art. 4921.
- O gosudarstvennoj sudebno-jekspertnoj dejatel’nosti v Rossijskoj Federacii: federal’nyj zakon ot 31.05.2001 № 73-FZ [Federal Law of 31.05.2001 № 73-FZ «On state forensic activities in the Russian Federation»]. Collection of Law of the Russian Federation, 2001, no. 23, art. 2291.
- Orlov Yu. K. Zakljuchenie jeksperta i ego ocenka po ugolovnym delam [Expert evidence and its evaluation in criminal matters]. Moscow, 1995. 64 p.
- Slovar’ osnovnyh terminov sudebnyh jekspertiz [Glossary of key terms of forensic examinations]. Moscow, VNIISJe, 1980. 92 p.
- Aver’janova T. V. Sudebnaja jekspertiza. Kurs obshhej teorii [Forensics. The course of the general theory]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2008. 480 p.
- O vnesenii izmenenij v federal’nyj zakon «Ob oru - zhii»: federal’nyj zakon ot 10.07.2012 № 113-FZ [Federal Law ot 10.07.2012 № 113-FZ «On Amending the Federal Law “On Weapons”»]. ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].
- Latyshov I. V. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy kriminalisticheskogo issledovanija ognestrel’nogo oruzhija nezavodskoj sborki (na primere 5,45 mm avtomatov Kalashnikova). Dis. … kand. jur. nauk [Theoretical and methodological foundations of forensic research fi rearm factory assembly (for example, 5.45 mm Kalashnikov assault rifl es). Dr. law sci. diss.]. Volgograd, 1997. 197 p.
- Latyshov I. V. Vozmozhnosti kriminalisticheskogo issledovanija ognestrel’nogo oruzhija, sobrannogo iz detalej i uzlov, pohishhennyh s zavodovizgotovitelej [Possibilities of forensic research fi rearms assembled from parts and components stolen from manufacturers]. Ispol’zovanie dostizhenij nauki i tehniki v preduprezhdenii, raskrytii i rassledovanii prestuplenij: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. / pod red. A. I. Demidova i dr. [The use of science and technology in the prevention, detection and investigation of crimes: materials scientific conference. Ed. by A. I. Demidov, etc.] Saratov, SVSh MVD Rossii, 1994, pp. 42–45.
- Latyshov I. V. Vozmozhnosti ispol’zovanija tehnologicheskih svedenij oruzhejnyh proizvodstv v sudebnoballisticheskih issledovanijah [The possibility of using information technology in the production of weapons-grade ballistic forensic studies]. Teorija i praktika jekspertnyh issledovanij v svete Zakona Rossijskoj Federacii «Ob oruzhii»: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Pod red. A. I. Zheleznjakova i dr. [Theory and practice of expert studies in the light of the RF Law «On Weapons»: hi. sat scientific. papers. Ed. by A. I. Zheleznyakov, etc.]. Volgograd, SVSh MVD Rossii, 1996, pp. 17–19.
- Latyshov I. V., Pleskachevskij V. M. Konstruktivnye osobennosti ognestrel’nogo oruzhija nezavodskoj sborki [Design features homemade fi rearms assembly]. Kriminalisticheskaja jekspertiza. Trasologicheskie i sudebnoballisticheskie issledovanija: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. st. Pod red. B. N. Morozova [Forensic analysis. Trasological ballistic and forensic research: hi. sat scientifi c papers. Ed. by B. N. Morozov]. Saratov, SVSh MVD Rossii, 1997, pp. 40–43.
- Latyshov I. V., Vasil’ev V. A. K voprosu o predelah kompetencii sudebnogo jeksperta pri proizvodstve sudebno-ballisticheskih jekspertiz [On the question of competence within a forensic expert in forensic ballistic examinations]. Aktual’nye problemy prakticheskoj napravlennosti obrazovatel’nogo processa v VUZah sistemy MVD Rossii: sb. nauch. tr.; redkol.: Yu. S. Chicherin i dr. [Actual problems of practical orientation of the educational process in universities of the Russian Interior Ministry: sat scientific. papers. Ed. Board. Yu. S. Chicherin, etc.]. Volgograd, VA MVD Rossii, 2010, pp. 188–190.
- Latyshov I. V., Vasil’ev V. A. O rasshirenii vozmozhnostej jeksperta-ballista pri proizvodstve sudebnoballisticheskih issledovanij sledov vystrela [About empowerment of expert in forensic ballistic research of shot’s traces]. Vestnik Volgogradskoj akademii MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Volgograd Academy of the Russian Interior Ministry], 2010, no. 3 (14), pp. 60–64.
- Kompleksnoe sudebno-ballisticheskoe issledovanie boepripasov k ohotnich’im gladkostvol’nym ruzh’jam: ucheb.-metod. posobie dlja jekspertov [Complex forensic ballistic study ammunition hunting smoothbore guns: ucheb.- method. allowance for experts]. Moscow, VNIISE, 1979. 143 p.