Cite this article as:

Vestov F. A., Fast O. F. The Legal State as a Problem of Professional Consciousness of Lawyers. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 326-332. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

The Legal State as a Problem of Professional Consciousness of Lawyers

Introduction. There is no sufficient difference in comprehension of the law-governed state in legal literature and research. Focusing on the existing theories of the law-governed state, modern authors of scientific publications and manuals compose lists of features of the “true law-governed state”, “welfare state” as well as their antipode – “police ridden state”. Theoretical analysis. The phenomenon of the law-governed state is existing in the normative ideological, institutional and functional dimensions. Due to the national conditions of development of Russia around the turn of the past and current centuries, a specific institutional design has been formed. Sometimes it does not coincide with the normative character of Russian rule of law depicted in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Empirical analysis. A sociological study was conducted among law students of the undergraduate program (full-time and part-time). The objective of the study was to establish exactly how students, future qualified employees of law enforcement agencies and public administration bodies, understand what the rule of law is. In total, 90 respondents aged 19–21 were involved. They were asked 5 questions regarding the characteristics of the “legal”, “police” and “social” states and template answers. Of these, respondents could freely and in unlimited number choose ones that are more in line with their understanding of the subject of the survey. Results. The survey revealed that law students quite successfully solve the problem of distinguishing between different types of states. However, they do not see the general direction in which a significant change in the characteristics of the state could give rise to some of its fundamentally new qualities.

  1. Vestov F. A., Fast O. F. Perception of the State Legal Problems in the XXI Century. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Sociology. Politology, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 342–345 (in Russian). DOI:
  2. Vestov F. A., Fast O. F. “Police State”: Problems of the Modern Theory. Basis, 2019, no. 1 (5), pp. 37–43 (in Russian).
  3. Fast O. F., Vestov F. A. Some aspects of the signs of an authoritarian state and their perception by law students. Pravo i pravookhranitel’naia deiatel’nost’ v Rossii, stranakh SNG i Evropeiskogo soiuza: zakonodatel’nost’ i sotsial’naia effektivnost’ [Law and law enforcement in Russia, the CIS countries and the European Union: legislation and social efficiency: Materials of the V Int. sci. and pract. conf.]. Saratov, Saratovskiy istochnik Publ., 2018, pp. 128–134 (in Russian).
  4. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by the popular vote of 12.12.1993) (amended by Federal Constitutional Law 6-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 7-FKZ of 30.12.2008, Federal Constitutional Law 2-FKZ of 05.02.2014, Federal Constitutional Law 11-FKZ of 21.07.2014). Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2014, no. 31, art. 4398 (in Russian).
  5. Sergeev S. G. Extraconstitutional Political Institutions: Legal and Political Science Dimension. Sovremennoe pravo (Modern law), 2012, no. 1, pp. 7–12. Available at: (accessed 10 January 2019) (in Russian).
  6. Zaznaev O. I. A Modern Discussion about the Best Form of Government. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki [Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series], 2013, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 199–205 (in Russian).
  7. Kuznetsov I. I. Institutional design of Russian authority: The impact of external factors on the formation of government. Political Science, 2016, Special iss., pp. 227–244 (in Russian).
  8. Vestov F. A. Institution of the rule of law and the role of power structures in it. Konstitutsionnye problem narodovlastiya v sovremennom mire [Constitutional problems of democracy in the modern world: Proceedings of the VI Int. forum dedicated to the 105th anniversary of the SSU. N. G. Chernyshevsky (Saratov, December 12, 2014). Collection of scientifi c articles. Vol. 6, pt. 1. Saratov, Saratovskiy istochnik Publ., 2015, pp. 41–44 (in Russian).
  9. Obolonsky A.V. Citizen and state: a new paradigm of relations and steps for its institutionalization. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Questions of state and municipal management], 2011, no. 1, pp. 5–16 (in Russian).
  10. Attitude of citizens of the Russian Federation to the institution of power. Zhurnal Ctentra ekspertizy i obschestvennogo monitoringa (Journal of the Center for expertise and public monitoring (CEOM)). January 17, 2019. Available at: (accessed 18 January 2019) (in Russian).
  11. Tumeneva N. V. Features of the Application of the Universal Criteria of Science in Law. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 82–88 (in Russian). DOI:
Full Text (PDF):