Cite this article as:

Dorofeyeva L. I., Ermolova O. V., Kirsanov V. V. Priorities and Mechanisms for Managing the Interbranch Structure of the Agri-Food Complex. Izv. Saratov Univ., Economics. Management. Law, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 429-438. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Priorities and Mechanisms for Managing the Interbranch Structure of the Agri-Food Complex

Introduction. In managing the competitive advantages of the agri-food complex, the study of the structural modernization of the agri-food complex on the basis of taking into account the levels of risks and the uncertainties of the economic situation that determine the possible boundaries of the use of regulatory measures is of particular importance. An interdisciplinary approach to the analysis and prediction of the structure of the complex opens up new possibilities for research, taking into account the relationships and interactions of all its elements. Theoretical analysis. The quality of the economic dynamics of the complex and its compliance with the long-term development goals of the Russian economy are evaluated. Trends in the interbranch structure, and priorities of state support have been revealed. Empirical analysis. The results of import substitution in the agri-food complex have been analyzed. The factors and structure of its growth have been revealed. The interbranch structure of the participation of various stages of its product chains in the production of total value added has been estimated. The stability of the local production systems of the complex has been characterized. Consumption growth is considered as an independent driver of the economic growth of the complex. The influence of the dynamics and structural parameters of investments has been analyzed. Results. It has been proved that structural balance largely determines the competitive stability of the development of the agri-food complex as a diversified system. Based on the interbranch analysis, new directions of development of the structure of the complex have been identified, directions of its state support have been clarified. Priorities of the foreign trade policy of the complex have been determined.

  1. Natsional’nye scheta v Rossii d 2014-2018 gg.: stat. sb. [National accounts of Russia in 2014–2018. Stat. sat.]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2019. 263 p. (in Russian).
  2. Ermolova O. V., Kirsanov V. V. Structural changes in product chains in the agrifood complex. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika [Science review: Theory and practice], 2017, no. 12, pp. 37–45 (in Russian).
  3. OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2019. OECD. April 2019. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  4. Annual Report 2020. World Trade Organization, 2020. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  5. Kinnunen P., Guillaume J. H. A., Tak, M., D’Odorico P., Siebert S., Puma M. J., Jalava M., Kummu M. Local food crop production can fulfil demand for less than one-third of the population. Nat Food, 2020, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 229–237. DOI:
  6. Global value chains in agriculture and food: A synthesis of OECD analysis. OECD, 2020. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers. No. 139. 25 p. DOI:
  7. Global Value Chain Development Report – Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. World Bank, 2017. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  8. Globalization in transition: The future of trade and value chains. McKinsey Global Institute, 2019. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  9. International trade statistics 2001–2020. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  10. Agricultural policy monitoring and evaluation. Available at: (accessed 10 May 2020).
  11. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019–2028. FAOOECD, 2019. DOI:
  12. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation – 2019. OECD, 01 Jul 2019. Available at: (accessed 10 July 2020).
Full Text (PDF):