Cite this article as:

Ogurtsova E. V., Chelnokova O. Y. Evaluation of Realization of Basic Functions of Regional Systems of Higher Education. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 169-? DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2018-18-2-169-175


Heading: 

Evaluation of Realization of Basic Functions of Regional Systems of Higher Education

Introduction. In the context of globalization, the competitiveness of the national economy is largely determined by the dynamics of the development of regional innovation and educational systems and the effectiveness of interaction among their subjects, among which regional higher education systems are becoming a significant driver of innovative growth. The purpose of the study is to develop methods for quantifying the effectiveness of the functioning and implementation of basic functions by regional higher education systems on the basis of a functional approach. Theoretical analysis. The sustainable and competitive development of the region’s economy in response to modern global challenges is largely determined by the quality of the workforce and the regional education system. Empirical analysis. Based on the analysis of the basic functions of universities, the results of the activity of the regional educational systems of 830 universities from 80 regions of the Russian Federation for 2016 were analyzed, the indicators characterizing the functioning of regional higher education systems were grouped into 3 groups according to the number of basic functions to trace the manifestations of each function. Results. The conducted research allowed to evaluate the functional dynamics, structure and volume indicators characterizing the quality of the implementation of the basic functions of regional higher education systems. Comparison of the results obtained by regions of the Russian Federation allows us to draw conclusions about the balance of regional systems of higher education.

References: 

1. Ogurtsova E. V. Development conditions of intangible manufacture in modern economy. Konfl ikty v sovremennom mire: mezhdunarodnoe, gosudarstvennoe i mezhlichnostnoe izmerenie. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Confl icts in the modern world: international, state and interpersonal dimension. Materials of the V Int. Sci. Conf.]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 355–359 (in Russian). 

2. Firsova A. A., Ogurtsova E. V. Approaches to the Methodology for Assessing the Contribution of the University in the Innovative Development of the Region. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 85–90 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2016-16-1-85-90. 

3. Bell D. Griaduschee postindustrial’noe obschestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya [The coming of postindustrial society. A venture of social forecasting]. Мoscow, 1999. 956 p. (in Russian). 

4. Informatsionno-analiticheskie materialy po rezul’tatam provedeniia monitoringa effektivnosti deiatel’nosti obrazovatel’nykh organizatsii vysshego obrazovaniia (Information and analytical materials on the results of monitoring the effectiveness of educational institutions of higher education). Ministerstvo obrazovaniia i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation). Available at: http://indicators. miccedu.com/monitoring/?m=vpo (accessed 23 January 2017) (in Russian).

5. Federal’naia sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki (The Russian Federal Service of State Statistics. Site). Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/ connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/en/statistics/science_and_ innovations/science/# (accessed 23 January 2017) (in Russian).

Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
опубликована
Short Text (PDF):