Cite this article as:

Tumeneva N. V. Criteria of Scientific Character of Legal Knowledge and Practice of Their Application. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 343-? DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2018-18-3-343-348


Heading: 

Criteria of Scientific Character of Legal Knowledge and Practice of Their Application

Introduction. The complexity of the objects of legal influence, the enrichment of the theory due to the increment of new knowledge from non-legal spheres raise the question, firstly, about the demarcation of legal knowledge in the Humanities, secondly, about increasing the requirements for the accuracy of the object-subject area and the methodology of legal research, thirdly, about the formalization of legal phenomena in legal practice, finally, about the evaluation of the results of the research, in terms of their practical utility, social relevance. These issues cannot be solved without the application of scientific criteria of legal knowledge. The purpose is to identify a set of scientific criteria necessary and suitable for the standardization of legal knowledge. Theoretical analysis. It is necessary to form a system of disciplinary scientific criteria in law as a tool for assessing legal knowledge, which has a number of features (in particular, state-legal phenomena are complex unique systems, the analysis of which necessarily takes into account political and historical factors, worldview preferences of the researcher, the choice of research methodology, etc., and this increases the subjective moment in their assessment). This fact does not always allow uniform application of universal criteria for the standardization of legal knowledge. Conclutions. The problem of establishing the boundaries of the formalization and materialization of the state-legal phenomena is solved by applying a set of criteria of scientific character, allowing, first, to state the scientific significance of the objects of knowledge, and secondly, to withdraw the legal phenomena of abstraction (the sphere of tacit knowledge) into an object-subject area and give them a categorical status.

References: 

1. Il’in V. V. Kriterii nauchnosti znaniya [Criteria of scientific knowledge]. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ., 1989. 128 p. (in Russian).

2. Hohlov E. B. Legal chimeras as a problem of modern Russian legal science. Izvestiya vuzov. Pravovedenie [Proccedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie], 2004, no. 1, pp. 4–14 (in Russian).

3. Potapov S. M. Nauchnye osnovy prava. T. 1. Formula prava kak iavlenie deistvitel’nosti [Scientific basis of law. Vol. 1. Formula of law as a phenomenon of reality]. St. Petersburg: Print house of А. S. Suvorin. 76 p. (in Russian).

4. Tarasov N. N. Metodologicheskie problemy iuridicheskoi nauki [Methodological problems of legal science]. Ekaterinburg: Humanity University Press, 2001. 264 p. (in Russian).

5. Kozlov V. A. Problema predmeta i metodologii obschei teorii prava [The problem of the subject and methodo logy of the general theory of law]. Leningrad: Leningrad Univ. Publ., 1989. 120 p. (in Russian).

6. Cherdancev A .F. Integrative misunderstanding of law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2016, no. 10, pp. 5–15 (in Russian).

7. Vedeneev Yu. A. Law: the end or the beginning? Lex Russica, 2014, vol. XCVI, no. 9, pp. 1009–1022 (in Russian).

8. Tarasov N. N. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennogo pravovedeniya [Methodological problems of modern jurisprudence]. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Jur.). Ekaterinburg, 2002. 42 p. (in Russian).

9. Maslennikov A.V. Pravovye aksiomy [Legal axioms]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Jur.). Vladimir, 2006. 24 p. (in Russian).

10. Syryh V. M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obschei teorii prava: v 2 t. T. 1. Elementnyi sostav [Logical foundations of a general theory of law: in 2 vol. Vol. 1. The elemental composition]. Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2000. 528 p. (in Russian).

11. Ruzavin G. I. Matematizatsiya nauchnogo znaniya [Mathematization of scientific knowledge]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1984. 207 p. (in Russian).

12. Koronovskij A. A., Trubeckov D. I. Nelineinaya dinamika v deistvii: Kak idei nelineinoi dinamiki pronikaut v ekologiyu, ekonomiku i social’nye nauki [Nonlinear dynamics in action: How the ideas of nonlinear dynamics penetrate into the ecology, economy and social sciences]. Saratov: College Publ., 2002. 324 p. (in Russian).

13. Orlov D. V. The process of integration and some aspects of the influence of the influence of neuroscience on the development and formation of modern criminal law. Pravo i politika [Law and politics], 2017, no. 2, pp. 60–66 (in Russian).

14. Tumeneva N. V. Scientific criteria exploring the right to life. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law], 2008, no. 1, pp. 65–70 (in Russian).

15. Kedrov B. M. Klassifikatsiya nauk. Prognoz K. Marksa o nauke buduschego [Classification of sciences. The prognosis of K. Marx about the science of the future]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1985. 543 p. (in Russian).

16. Zor’kin V. D. The Ratio of the ideological and educational aspects of bourgeois law. In: Pravo i bor’ba idey v sovremennom mire. Kritika burzhuaznykh sovremennykh kontsepciy prava [Law and the struggle of ideas in the modern world. Critique of modern bourgeois concepts of law: materials sci. conf. (Moscow, 24–26 December 1979)]. Moscow: The Institute of State and Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1980, pp. 20–25 (in Russian).

17. Lisjutkin A. B. Juridicheskoe znachenie kategorii «oshibka»: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy aspekt [Legal significance of the category “error”: theoreticalmethodological aspect]. Saratov: SGAP Publ., 2001. 348 p. (in Russian).

18. Shabalin V. A. Metodologicheskie voprosy pravovedeniya [Methodological questions of jurisprudence]. Saratov: Saratov University Press, 1972. 226 p. (in Russian).

19. Tumeneva N. V. Logical foundations of law (to question statement). Trudy Tambovskogo filiala Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii za 2006 g. [Proceedings of Tambov branch of the Moscow University of MIA of Russia for 2006. Ed. by I. F. Amelchakov, R. B. Osokin, A. A. Safonov. Iss. 10]. Tambov: R. V. Pershin's Publ., 2007, pp. 91–107 (in Russian).

20. Razuvaev N. V. Contemporary theory of law in search of a post-classical paradigm of cognition. Izvestiya vuzov. Pravovedenie [Proceedings of Higher Education Institutions. Pravovedenie], 2014, no. № 5 (316), pp. 136–153 (in Russian).

Full Text (PDF): 
Status: 
опубликована
Short Text (PDF):